🛫 for 6 months
🚛 for 9 months
That's about it (THREAD)
But in a world where the EU did want to reduce some of the damage of no deal, we at @CBItweets have some thoughts about what it could do (2/15)
Firms in the EU haven't done much to get ready. 18% of 🇩🇪's Mittelstand report being well prepared, 33% of 🇸🇪's firms are ready. They need to do less than UK biz, but will be looking for reassurance in no deal - from use of FS to legal use of UK products (3/15)
The EU's taken a mis-matched approach to this - eg its let chemicals firms sign up in advance to be ready for exit day and granted 3rd country status in animal products (5/15)
The UK will still have to meet EU rules, so shouldn't be too big an ask to start early (6/15)
I hope there's a secret plan for how the EU organises for post-no deal emergency talks. Because they'll have to happen. We can't just all sit round ignoring the Irish border. Making sure individuals know they'll play a role in that is important (7/15)
Those two days are the only time that EU PMs, Presidents, Chancellors etc. have booked in to talk Brexit together. It's going to be a big leap if any further contingencies are to be agreed (9/15)
💾 Data exchanges
🍗 Regulation of food
⚗️ Chemicals
🔋 Energy
💶 Gaps in financial services, such as cross-border mortgage contracts (11/15)
This will UNDOUBTEDLY vary from country to country. But if a UK lorry driver has obviously tried to meet requirements but made a small error, how heavily will you fine them? (12/15)
Allowing proper coordination at ports; continued information exchange in customs, public health and consumer safety; permitting chemicals registration data to be shared... (14/16)
This is what COULD be done. Some may already be. I'm fully aware of why the rest isn't (15/16)
Taking these actions could genuinely make a difference to reduce no deal disruption. That seems worth a try (16/16)