, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
The facts are these. There were two options for the Supreme Court: one that it was lawful for the PM to suspend Parliament and the other that it was not. Both had political consequences but both also engage a constitutional principle: the supremacy of Parliament. That's it.
It is extraordinary - and alarming - that the Government should question the authority of a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court. This is a direct challenge to the rule of law. It should bear in mind what Thatcher said:
And, as a legal matter, if the Supreme Court says it is the law it is the law. Saying "this is the law" is what it is the Supreme Court's job to do. Johnson and Cummings and the other moral detritus they drag in with them have no mandate to question the Supreme Court's decision.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Jo Maugham QC
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!