@CaroleKay11 40/ Another example of the kind of person Trump has to rely on to defend him. After I tweeted the pic here:
which shows that for a while now R Presidents have been pulling deficits higher and D Presidents have been pulling them lower. @ZeeSteve1 ...
which shows that for a while now R Presidents have been pulling deficits higher and D Presidents have been pulling them lower. @ZeeSteve1 ...
41/ ... lied about what it shows. In 2008 our economy was cratering under the last R President (Bush) and he left a cratering economy for Obama. Jobs were being lost at a high rate per month as Obama took over. Turning that economy around was done partially with high deficits.
42/ They came down over time, but @ZeeSteve1 claimed that they didn't until late in Obama's 8 years, which is an outright lie. @ZeeSteve1 really wants to compare the same point in Obama's first term to Trump's since a Republican had left a horrible economy for Obama and ...
43/ ... Obama left a good economy for Trump. Anybody who knows anything about economics knows that driving up the deficit during good times is not the same as driving up the deficit while trying to save a horrible economy.
44/ Here is another example of the kind of person Trump has to rely on for support, but this one may be a little bit different because they may have been a reasonable and ethical person at one point. Trump perverts people though.
45/ @ChrisWarmuth didn't know enough about Trump to even know that he lied for years about writing "The Art of the Deal", but they knew enough to know they wanted to support Trump.
46/ @ChrisWarmuth claimed that Bill Clinton is a rapist, but Trump isn't. One of their reasons for that claim is because Bill Clinton was friends with Epstein. @ChrisWarmuth tried to dismiss Trump's long friendship with Epstein by claiming that Trump kicked a woman out of ...
47/ ... his resort when a woman complained about this, when that is an unconfirmed rumor and wouldn't excuse Trump's close ties to Epstein and other pedophiles. @ChrisWarmuth also tried to dismiss the things Trump did by claiming he might have cheated on his wives.
48/ @ChrisWarmuth claimed they wouldn't be okay with Trump groping or having sex with minors, although they didn't seem bothered enough by this:
to not go hard in defending Trump afterward.
to not go hard in defending Trump afterward.
49/ @ChrisWarmuth claims that Bill Clinton is a "high level-gangster" type, but doesn't mind Trump's mob type behavior. @ChrisWarmuth even defended that Ukraine call as not a problem as they claim Clinton is that gangster type.
50/ I had said that Bill Clinton probably is a rapist, and would be pointing this stuff out about Trump even if he was a Democrat, but when I pointed out Trump's ties to John Casablancas, who partied with Trump and provided models for Trump, and was such a pedophile that ...
51/ ... Casablancas married a 17 yr-old after dating a 15 or 16 yr-old (there seems some debate as to just how young she was when they started) @ChrisWarmuth told me that I'm intellectual dishonest.
52/ However @ChrisWarmuth started, they ended up being the kind of person who seems to just want to be on a winning team with Trump and isn't set back by all the evidence about Trump's treatment of minor female children (and women).
53/ It is one thing to run across people who were clearly never good people, but I think it is sick that people like this @ChrisWarmuth turn out to be as perverted as this one seems to be, although maybe Chris was always excited about defending pedophilic types.
@ChrisWarmuth 54/ So @ChrisWarmuth showed up here to tell me I was a moron for saying in 45/ above that they didn't know enough about Trump to know he lied about writing TAOTD. Their reason for claiming I was a moron is that they didn't say anything about the book.
55/ They had in fact brought up the name of the book when I asked if they knew of any books Trump had written. So, they countered that by saying, "I never used it to support any of my arguments." I never said they did. I said they weren't aware.
56/ So, @ChrisWarmuth never actually addressed my claim that they didn't know enough to know Trump didn't write TAOTD, but claims I am an moron and that I am intellectually dishonest. Besides considering Chris to be unethical, they seem to blame me for their reading issues.
@ChrisWarmuth 57/ @ChrisWarmuth might keep telling me I must be obsessed with them for giving people an example of the kind of people who support Trump, but to recap (as I still find these patterns for Trumpsters interesting):
58/
1) I said that Chris didn't even know Trump had lied about writing TAOTD.
2) Chris said I was a moron because they hadn't said anything about the book.
3) I provided proof that they had.
4) Chris said I was wrong because they hadn't used the book to support their args.
1) I said that Chris didn't even know Trump had lied about writing TAOTD.
2) Chris said I was a moron because they hadn't said anything about the book.
3) I provided proof that they had.
4) Chris said I was wrong because they hadn't used the book to support their args.
59/
5) I pointed out that @ChrisWarmuth saying they didn't use it to support their args doesn't counter 1).
6) Chris never actually addressed 1), but claimed I was the one being intellectually dishonest.
I think it says something that this is the kind of support Trump needs.
5) I pointed out that @ChrisWarmuth saying they didn't use it to support their args doesn't counter 1).
6) Chris never actually addressed 1), but claimed I was the one being intellectually dishonest.
I think it says something that this is the kind of support Trump needs.
@ChrisWarmuth *a moron
@ChrisWarmuth 60/ Another example of the kind of support Trump requires. They can't defend Trump having lower job creation than Obama was doing before Trump, as I pointed out here:
61/ So instead they do things like troll and just try to be annoying to help Trump, like @DallmannDawn here:
@DallmannDawn 62/ Another example. @jam7duma has to claim the Mueller inv. cost $40M even though it may have been about $0 after forfeitures. This 1 seems really ignorant. They like to repeat that Trump hasn't been charged:
@DallmannDawn @jam7duma 63/ And here @jam7duma goes claiming Mueller told Barr the OLC memo had no bearing on his report. That is false. It is not what Mueller said or what Barr claimed Mueller said. People like @jam7duma were fooled by Barr and spread their falsehood:
@DallmannDawn @jam7duma 64/ This @jam7duma is either lying about reading the Mueller Report, or they didn't understand what they read. Mueller was very clear that the OLC memo was used to decide that they would not make a decision on whether Trump committed a federal crime.
65/ There is a lot in the Mueller Report about the OLC memo and how it meant it affected their decisions. Don't let Trumpsters and people like Rush Limbaugh (who deceived about this) fool you. The memo was important. I explained what Barr & Mueller said:
66/ After proving that they either lied about reading the Mueller Report or didn’t understand what they read, @jam7duma followed me. I didn’t block Sweet Lilly for their dumb tweets, but will for following me after all those.
@jam7duma 67/ Another example of the kind of support Trump needs. This one has claimed something I said was false before, and I needed to learn the facts, then wouldn't back up their claim. This time @MemeWiggins responded to a tweet of mine with:
68/ @MemeWiggins wouldn't tell me what she claimed was false in my tweet, so I took a shot. She eventually told me that Sondland, who gave Trump's campaign $1M, is ambassador to the EU, and was doing Trump's bidding with Ukraine, is a Never Trumper.
69/ Of course, @MemeWiggins wasn't going to show any integrity after claiming that what I had said wasn't true and that I needed to learn the facts. I've gotten used to confident ignorance on @charliekirk11's feed. His fans tend to be uninformed, and slow, like he likes them.
@MemeWiggins @charliekirk11 70/ I had thought fans of Q probably were pretty gullible, but I hadn't realized just how gullible until yesterday. I think Q fan @BrianD1010 deleted most of his tweets about this, but not before he told me that the 2018 midterms worked out just the way Q wanted.
71/ @BrianD1010 said that the way the midterms worked out were right to Q's plan since they would help Trump in 2020. Brian tweeted claim after claim from Q saying 53-47 in the Senate is what Q wanted.
It would be difficult to get much dumber than that.
It would be difficult to get much dumber than that.
72/ I'll start with what happened in the midterms. Trump's side lost the House by the biggest popular vote margin in history. That resulted in the House going to D majority, which allows the Ds to stop crazy Trump bills and to get subpoena power.
73/ The Rs changed the rules when they were in the majority to expand subpoena power so multiple people in the majority party get it. Therefore the Ds flipping the House gave them extra subpoena power to investigate compared to even before.
73/ Without D subpoena power it would be much easier for Barr and Trump to keep things covered up. Without Ds flipping the House we might already be very close to the authoritarian system Trump wants, with little check on Trump cheating on 2020.
74/ Yet this Q fan (@BrianD1010) believes Q that they wanted Ds to control the House so it would help Trump. Here is my response to Brian telling me that Q wanted the midterms to go just as they went, with my question above. I think they deleted their's.
@BrianD1010 75/ For the Senate Trump's side won just 10 races and lost 22. That is like an NFL going 5 and 11 in a 16 game season. Trump's side would be able to claim that as a win because they were only defending 8 of the open seats. Ds were defending 3/4ths of them.
76/ Clearly winning more than 31% of the races would have been better for Trump's side. Those are 6 year terms, so they go from 2019 until the end of 2024. The resulting 53-47 for R majority in the Senate is good, but they defend about 2/3rds of the open seats in 2020 and 2022.
77/ Higher than 53-47 would of course give the Rs more margin in the Senate now, and make it harder for Ds to take the Senate in 2020 or 2022. Yet Q wants his fans to believe he has power to control what happens, but didn't want higher than 53-47, or a 31% win percentage.
78/ It shouldn't take any more than knowing that Q claims winning 31% of the Senate races was the goal to know that Q is a fraud. Only extremely gullible people would think that the Rs winning more than 31% of the Senate races would have hurt Trump and Rs, so they wanted 31%.
79/ Another couple of MAGAt examples. @Rex81702139 and @deenashap915 are okay with Trump repeatedly walking in on 15-19 year old girls dressing and ogling a minor child, since one D President did sexual things with an adult intern in the WH:
@Rex81702139 @deenashap915 80/ Another example of the kind of person needs to get support from. This one lies for him and to put down the left. @GingerMarse claims that she said Trump hasn't done stuff because she says liberals are the ones who don't believe people are innocent until proven guilty.
81/ @GingerMarse also says Bill Clinton is a rapist and Hillary kills people, and she defends Trump's pedophilic behavior:
Why is it so hard to find ethical people who support Trump? That was rhetorical, of course.
Why is it so hard to find ethical people who support Trump? That was rhetorical, of course.
@GingerMarse 82/ I see that @Rex81702139 has shown up to come up with every excuse he can for him being okay with Trump purposely walking in on minor children dressing and ogling one of them on camera. As I said right above, why is it so hard to find ethical people who support Trump?
@GingerMarse @Rex81702139 83/ This guy @Rex81702139 seems to think that Jeffrey Epstein could only have one friend. Epstein had 3 phone numbers for 13 year old Ivanka. And Trump let 15 year old Ivanka do risque pics for pedophile John Casablancas' company. Trump partied with both those pedos.
84/ Casablancas would provide models for partying with Trump, including young ones. Casablancas dated a girl that was 15 or 16, and he married a 17 year old when he was about 50.
Trump praised Epstein as a terrific guy who liked them on the younger side, and Trump ...
Trump praised Epstein as a terrific guy who liked them on the younger side, and Trump ...
85/ ... said he had known Epstein for 15 years at that time. We can go over the claim that Trump eventually kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago if people want.
I don't excuse what Bill Clinton did with Epstein, but these Trumpsters are okay with what Trump did with minor children.
I don't excuse what Bill Clinton did with Epstein, but these Trumpsters are okay with what Trump did with minor children.
86/ Trump requires support from people who are unethical, or ignorant, or both. @Pamhaze is an example of a person who has to reject data even from the government Trump is the head of, so that she can try to make Trump's performance look better than it is.
87/ I provided links to the government data, and even showed the math, in what I put here:
@Pamhaze couldn't address the data, so she just claimed it wasn't true. I bet she isn't capable of running the math for us.
@Pamhaze couldn't address the data, so she just claimed it wasn't true. I bet she isn't capable of running the math for us.
@Pamhaze 88/ Here is another Trumpster who defended pedophilic stuff with Trump. After I showed @SunshineNikki4 the pic here:
she said that she just glanced at it because it isn't true. She defended his disturbing stuff with children by saying he owned pageants.
she said that she just glanced at it because it isn't true. She defended his disturbing stuff with children by saying he owned pageants.
@Pamhaze @SunshineNikki4 89/ Steve Bannon and Trump want people to believe their conspiracy theories. Only so many people are susceptible, but I don't think it is a coincidence that they tend to be the kind of people who don't care about Trump's treatment of women and children, like @SunshineNikki4.
90/ @SunshineNikki4 showed up and claimed my tweet 2 above was an attempt at doxxing her. She doesn't even know what that is. I've reached my limit of false things from this Trumpster, regardless of her defending Trump's pedophilic stuff, so I will be blocking her.
@SunshineNikki4 91/ Another example of a Trump supporter defending Trump's pedophilic behavior. @RickkidtchThoer claimed that it was fine for Trump to repeatedly walk in on 15-19 year old girls dressing and ogle a minor child because Trump owned the pageant after this:
@SunshineNikki4 @RickkidtchThoer 92/ Another example of the kind of people Trump has to get support from. @pax4pax responded (but not directly) to a tweet I made mentioning that there was a quid pro quo by Trump's team, by claiming that this was not reality. I responded here:
96/ "If a WBer turns in a military contractor exec for cheating US taxpayers and the case is totally solid without anything from the WBer's tipoff should the WBer need to testify, and should they be outed?"
Trumpster @meisje77 really didn't want to answer that.
Trumpster @meisje77 really didn't want to answer that.
97/ Here is what passes for an intelligent avoidance of my question and defense of Trump in Trumpland:
Why does Trump have so much trouble getting intelligent and ethical defenders? Again, that is rhetorical.
Why does Trump have so much trouble getting intelligent and ethical defenders? Again, that is rhetorical.
98/ Another example of the slow and low integrity kind of people Trump needs to get support from. I posted some facts here:
@YellowJrnl claimed that was false, but they can't come up with a single fact to back them up, because it is true.
@YellowJrnl claimed that was false, but they can't come up with a single fact to back them up, because it is true.
@YellowJrnl 99/ Then @YellowJrnl tried to back up their claim with an article that talked about an older poll from the first half of October when I had referenced a poll that was right before Trump showed up and had Bevin up by 5, like I said: 
@YellowJrnl 100/ Funny that @YellowJrnl showed up here to claim I was wrong even though that late poll (not 3 weeks before the election) had Bevin up by 5, like I had said.
@YellowJrnl 101/ @YellowJrnl continues to not only prove I was right originally, but was right that they would embarrass themselves. They actually think that telling me somebody considered the race a toss up makes my factual claim about a poll false. Funny stuff near:
@YellowJrnl 102/ Here is an example of somebody who makes false claim after false claim for Trump and shows no integrity whatsoever. Even though transcripts have been released showing Republican questions @Charlot83612159 spread the lie that Rs couldn't ask any:
103/ Of course @Charlot83612159 left that false claim out there as if it were true. She also lied that there was no quid pro quo by Trump's team and lied that this tweet had nothing but feelings in it:
104/ @Charlot83612159 then tried to excuse her lies by telling me what she likes about Trump, as if that makes lying okay. Sad thinking that Trump has done great things with North Korea as they work on their nukes and test fire missiles.
Looks like she deleted the top 1:
Looks like she deleted the top 1:
@Charlot83612159 105/ @Charlot83612159 even tried claiming that Trump didn't withhold anything, after Trump was withholding the aid for a long time, then the White House found out about the WBer. Some aid was released after it was decided that Trump didn't have authority.
@Charlot83612159 106/ I don't need to go into every detail of the reasons @Charlot83612159 gave for liking Trump (they are distractions from her lies), but it is clear that she buys whatever BS right wing media is selling. As far as her saying manufacturing jobs are back:
@Charlot83612159 107/ Here is an example of how far some Trump fans have to go to defend him. This one wouldn't say it directly and instead kept beating around the bush, but eventually confirmed that his position is that Russia did not help Trump in 2016.
108/ @SCunny01 claims to have read the Mueller report and also that Russia didn't help Trump. When I asked who they claim hacked the DNC, the best response Steven C Cunningham could come up with what to say it was HRC. Some of these Trumpsters are pretty funny.
