Why did Holmes respond affirmatively, & w/o clarification, to Goldman's mis-stated question mentioning President 'Zelensky' when Goldman clearly meant 'Trump'?
This assumes nobody would make a clip of this moment to confuse things, like Russia or Fox News.
#ImpeachmentHearing
This assumes nobody would make a clip of this moment to confuse things, like Russia or Fox News.
#ImpeachmentHearing
I mean, both Goldman & Holmes clearly knew Goldman meant Trump, & Holmes answered based on that shared knowledge, but that's not the point: the video record clearly says 'Zelensky'.
Glitches in the matrix can be weaponized just like anything else, no?
#ImpeachmentHearing
Glitches in the matrix can be weaponized just like anything else, no?
#ImpeachmentHearing
Actually, there's an earlier glitch here, where Goldman says President Zelensky but meaning Ambassador Sondland.
Why is Goldman introducing glitches?
01:28:43
YOU WERE ABLE TO HEAR SOME OF WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID TO PRESIDENT ZELENSKY, RIGHT?
c-span.org/video/?466380-…
Why is Goldman introducing glitches?
01:28:43
YOU WERE ABLE TO HEAR SOME OF WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID TO PRESIDENT ZELENSKY, RIGHT?
c-span.org/video/?466380-…
Here's the initial glitch: Zelensky should be Trump, Holmes didn't correct
01:31:39
...TO WHICH AMBASSADOR SONDLAND RESPONDED THAT HE WOULD AND HE WOULD, IN FACT, DO ANYTHING THAT PRESIDENT ZELENSKY WANTS. IS THAT AN ACCURATE RECITATION OF WHAT HAPPENED?
c-span.org/video/?466380-…
01:31:39
...TO WHICH AMBASSADOR SONDLAND RESPONDED THAT HE WOULD AND HE WOULD, IN FACT, DO ANYTHING THAT PRESIDENT ZELENSKY WANTS. IS THAT AN ACCURATE RECITATION OF WHAT HAPPENED?
c-span.org/video/?466380-…
I don't really care about impeachment or these hearings, my concern is, w/ foreign actors using disinformation, US officials should be more careful about exact wording & not assume corrections are obvious to future listeners who may only see clips w/o context
Top of this thread:
Top of this thread:
