“CDC report found that 62% of nursing home workers are refusing the vaccine”
“...First responders in New Mexico have sued after a county official ordered firefighters, corrections officers and other first responders to receive injections.”
The particular challenge with #COVID19#vaccine is that healthcare workers are primarily childbearing age & female in nursing, nursing home staff while most vulnerable are the elderly. If the main “fear” of vaccine is “fertility” then that fear affects former yet deaths in latter
So I started looking at sites I would never visit. Dear God. I mark these things up so as not to spread falsehoods. These conclusions are NOT supported by the studies cited. It is a conservative right wing Christian site concerned with women having too few babies.
Also, the cited study was later retracted due to severe methodological flaws.
“Microbiologist and science communicator Elisabeth Bik recently described the paper as ‘very flawed and biased’ with the potential to be ‘misinterpreted or misused.’”
I am SO tired of hysteria from one segment of the population siphoning off resources from needed science. It is either this crowd or the evangelical one. Both are not very diverse. Yet their fears are taken to the margins.
This is more bogus “#data” from not even a plausible biological model - but when has that stopped the anti-vaccine? There is not one aspect of #studydesign, data integrity, good survey methodology, privacy #ethics not violated. It’s a dumpster fire.
I simply have NO MORE patience for #misinformation like this. Academics & Phds, regardless of field of study, know better. Quality & standards are not a mystery. Even marketers call out they own bad data when online survey methodology
The idea that couple woman in the humanities, in the ivory tower, will listen to Twitter chatter on #vaccines “side effects”, use an online survey with leading questions to validate their beliefs that defy biological plausibility is again, the most privileged women spreading fear
Look at the autism scare and you will see the same pattern. Or with HPV scare. One mom, internet research, “confirmation” then raising the alarm.
But article also states that lack of integrity in medicine drives distrust. This is true.
Who is most easily targeted by fear as opposed to noticing the lack of any logical explanation? Those who are already traumatized or a grieving. Further, during the #pandemic, most people’s #mentalhealth has tanked, causing anxiety and depression
Refugees also have lived experience of needing to flee their own government as well as tough experiences as a refugee, often vilified or reviled. They are easy to target.
Once bad low quality nonsensical #data are created, they can spread like wildfire
It is not the fears of the marginalized that get picked up by media. It is the privileged humanities professor self styled as women’s advocate with flagrant Dunning–Kruger effect and Twitter platform in thousands. Yet call #vaccine “side effect” #misinformation by correct name?
Also, btw, any woman who has been in c-suite in NYC has literally worked with/around people with mob connections.
I take a lot of stands & speak on things that people want to keep hidden.
If there were “dirt” on me to find, it would have been found & used against me already.
I’m super annoying that way (in many ways) to folks who align against me.
When you are Muslim, activist, female, not seeking anyone’s patronage or protection, you are always exposed, surveilled, at risk - it is unavoidable.
Protection is in transparency, ethics, standards
These are life’s trade offs, I avoid certain shackles or cages and in doing so, carefully check off certain boxes to stay protected. I have worked in #compliance vs #fraud & #abuse, and I have seen every tiny detail that gets people caught up in the system. Stay out of harm’s way
Experience of past medical harm is not itself evidence every doctor is bullying you. As a woman & WOC, in/out of hospitals as a child, there is tons of trauma & medical sexism & racism I have experienced
yet all that is erased/denied by those using one lens vs intersectionality
Outside the ED of hospitalist medicine, when I “talk like a man” - direct, unvarnished truths and or “taking up too much space”, there is pushback, affront. Others have noted men with same style as me are👍 #WomeninSTEM #SciComm
“women don't negotiate for a very simple reason: they sense—correctly—that it will hurt them if they do... when women *do* negotiate... they end up worse off than if they’d kept their mouths shut”
Shame & #impostersyndrome = energy waste you canNOT afford (I realized w/ chronic illness & pain). You WILL fall - while rest & recovery are important - sometimes the ball about to drop is too important
Don’t miss your shot
BUT do miss a lot of shots. I promise you, it will drain you of less energy to try over and over than to try to be perfect. You will ALWAYS fail to be perfect. You will only sometimes fail to make the shot
I state, highlight, mark up, not insinuate
Why is someone who likely does not menstruate a sudden expert on #womenshealth to identify a WOC seeking #data#quality & #integrity as the threat...to women?
"Respecting" social science = using respectable methods, not online surveys.
Academic language on #online#survey#data:
"systematically assess carelessness in a crowdsourced sample" Denial that quick & dirty is poor #quality is an odd use of time & ineffective. One could better defend one's merit, by delivering #quality per best practices and standards.