To answer, this will be a long string of tweets. After the DefCon 1 post from Q that B passed on, I raised a public and loud objection. 1/
My intent here is not to open up these wounds again, but to address what you have raised. Frankly, there is NO excuse for Q to have used 2/
that acronym. I stand by that today, and will continue to do so. I can guarantee you, that I, nor any military, would use that acronym 3/
for ANYTHING BUT a DefCon 1 warning!! To describe "Defense Contractor" or "Definite Confirmation" I would NOT use DefCon! No Way! Even 4/
B explained it in one of her tweets as "Maximum Force Readiness (non-nuclear, a term even Q used). This entire episode is a problem.
The Twitter community, by and large, failed to comprehend the nature of this misuse of the term, DefCon, and rushed to defend Q. I backed 6/
off after talking to B to prevent any more damage to the Q mission. BUT, I do not buy the excuses. I was considering doing a follow-up 7/
YT video, but this will suffice. As most know, I was confident in the Q posts up through Nov 24. Since then, it has been a questionable 8/
debacle with one FUBAR/SNAFU after another with constant maneuvers. Yes, I warned of compromises. I understand. Do I think the Q posts 9/
continue to serve a purpose? Yes! But, these problems need ti be definitevly corrected, and we cannot condone or accept another mistake 10/
like the misuse of DefCon! Never! In this environment, such a misplacement/misuse of so vital a warning code is UNPROFESSIONAL, and casts11/
severe doubts upon the efficacy, honesty, knowledge, and intent of those conducting themselves in such manner! I want Q to be what we all12/
want him/them to be. But, I am NOT, as I often say, a "Yes Man," or "Go along to get along" guy! Deception is everywhere, as I have 13/
constantly warned. Q is the one making the claims, and it is Q that must be above reproach. Any other condition is folly and delusion!! 14/
So, I am onboard with Q, despite my concerns after Nov 24, 2017. But, I am wary; I am testing; I am watching; and I demand accountability!
I also add, that despite the opening of the collective consciousness Q provides, I believe it time for simple, straight-forward, language.
