Thread by @HisBlakeness

THREAD on Guccifer 1.0. and the Clinton Server.
1/
The awesome @tracybeanz has done some awesome research on timings and co-incidences about Marcel Lazar's (Guccifer1.0) hacking, and timeline meshing with the Page/Strozk texts. Go Read It.

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1006259492609241088

2/ There's a 2017 story by Fox news about Lazar. We see something very interesting: he handed over 70 Gb of data to the FBI, which Fox say is equivalent to 1.75 million pages to the FBI of text.
foxnews.com/politics/2017/…

But Fox are missing one vital detail.

3/ Lazar initially claimed he *had* hacked the Clinton server, and it was *easy*, he later retracted that statement (being in Jail would make you do that). The FBI add that there is no "evidence" he hacked the server.

4/ I want to throw out a possibility based on the previous hacks that Lazar released. He releases his hacks as **images**, or pdfs of images, of as images of the text copied to a pink background. He didn't, for some reason, release the full email with all the headers.

5/ Guccifer's documents can be seen here (search Guccifer): cryptome.org/cryptome-2013.…

6/ So. It's possible that no-one is lying, but they aren't telling the truth.

**He hacked the Clinton server**, but like his previous releases took screenshots. This would explain the large amount of data.

7/ This would explain why the FBI say there is no "evidence" he actually "hacked" the server - there are just images. To them images of text are not "evidence" of a breach of her server. The text could be from anywhere.

8/ If he hacked the Clinton server, and had agreed with the FBI to retract his claim about doing so, then it would also explain why as @tracybeanz says Priestep was nervous about a Fox news interview with Lazar.

Bottom line: He likely hacked the Clinton server.

FIN