Without a crisis to engage the public, the career politician is less significant.
#TermLimits
Both sides do it
They do it because there are no #TermLimits
#WeThePeople can put an end to it
#COS
#ArticleV
The elected who decide who will be electing them. Give a career politician an opportunity to solidify their power and they will.
#termlimits -> there is no longer a need to gerrymander to protect individual officials
#COS
DOES THIS MAP MAKE SENSE?
Or do you think some incumbent politician was able to Gerrymander the map to solidify his/her votes?
THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED FOR THE INCUMBENTS
#TermLimits - ONLY through a #ConventionOfStates #COS
#ArticleV
A vast majority of the time, Congress votes along exact party lines or very nearly along party lines.
Independent thought is squashed
#TermLimits
#TermLimits
#ConventionOfStates
#TermLimits would eliminate the need to follow the party line.
#COS
The 2016 race for the Congressional seat in Illinois 13th district - David Gill ran as Independent.
The D and R candidates needed 740 signatures on their petitions. David Gill was required 10,754.
#TermLimits
“Does an 11% Congressional approval rating but a 96.4% incumbent retention really reflect the will of the people?”
Those who make the rules win
#TermLimits
By keeping the voters divided, professional politicians stay in power. Through their #ManufacturedCrisis they keep us distracted.. we don’t focus on what they are really doing.
#TermLimits
Misinformation and divisiveness play right into the hands of the professional politician. They need the electorate divided and misinformed.
#TermLimits
Today’s incumbent politician NEEDS the citizens of America very divided and afraid of the other side.
It’s the FAULT of them that we R divided
#TermLimits
#TermLimits
YES - it can continue as long as the professional politicians who benefit from this cycle remain in power.
#WeThePeople need to recognize the importance of #TermLimits
And that does NOT equate to “vote them out” (see prior tweets in string)
This takes away the career politicians’ need to divide us. Instead of needing to please the hierarchy of the political parties to secure their seat, they can actually try to unite the country
-Thomas Jefferson
#TermLimits
They travel inside USA for free,dine lavishly, and go around the world on “official business” - all on our dime amongst other horrors
#TermLimits would go a long way to changing the attitudes that are so prevalent
George Will
#WeThePeople should become BIPARTISAN revolutionaries-willing 2 get beyond all of this & 2take our country back from the ruling political class
Term Limits is a STRUCTURE OF GOVERNMENT issue.
It is #bipartisan
If it favored #Democrats they would have done it when they controlled the Presidency / House / Senate. Same for the #Republicans
#WeThePeople vs the #Establishment
A REVOLUTION
1. Money and power can buy elections for incumbents. Incumbent politicians have little fear of being voted out.
2. Fair elections. Term-limited state legislatures have more contested elections than those without term limits.
3. Members of Congress will eventually have to live by the laws they pass.
4. Term limits restore the citizen legislature. No longer will occupying the same seat in Congress be a career choice or an accepted career path.
5. The legislature will reflect the look and the will of the people.
6. Seniority will no longer be the goal.
7. Term limits will guarantee turnover in our legislators.
8. Term limits will help limit corruption. By limiting the time in Congress, the individual representatives will not have decades to develop relationships with lobbyists and other special interest groups.
9. Complacency will no longer be rewarded. Today, doing nothing is a better way to ensure re-election than doing something.
10. All states will be on a level playing field. No one state could gain an advantage by having longer serving and thus more senior members of Congress.
11. Patronage would be lessened. Under the current system, a sitting politician can steer business to their friends, cronies, supporters or alma mater as long as they stay in office.
12. Institutions will no longer fear decades of retribution from professional politicians. With term limits, social services agencies and universities will no longer need to fear telling the truth to elected officials.
A divided citizenry is good 4 ratings.
The media NEEDS the electorate hungry 4 information to support their various political stances
Media Economics. Ratings = POWER
Currently, the media does NOT want #TermLimits b/c that is BAD 4 ratings
If the #TermLimitRevolution movement gains strength, the ratings-driven media may see that it is to their economic advantage to promote the Revolution.
1990’s Many states passed term limits on their federal representatives. Unfortunately, a Congressman challenged the law and it was struck down in 1995 by a 5-4 vote in a Supreme Court decision (US Term Limits V Thornton)
1990s:
23 states had some sort of term limit law & all were invalidated by the Supreme Court decision
Now it will take an AMENDMENT to the Constitution of the United States to bring about term limits.
Politicians, lobbyists, and media campaigned against term limits.
Solace can be taken in the fact that 23 states acted unilaterally 2 institute term limits
Voters were willing to limit their own legislators’ terms in office
If the SC hadn’t blocked #TermLimits, enough Congressmen would have seen the writing on the wall & presented a TL amendment to be ratified by the states.
In the 90s, the Republican Party paid lip service to term limits in The Contract With America.
Dozens of Congressmen ran on a platform that included #TermLimits
However, once elected these R’s split between several different amendments, some for six years, some eight, some 12, and others 18 years. They were able to divide support and ensure none of the #TermLimits bills would pass.
The R politicians were able to go home having protected incumbent advantage while claiming to support #termlimits with a vote to prove it.
It was another political game where politicians feigned support to play us
SHAME
The true reason that all efforts to pass #termlimits have failed to this point is a lack of leverage to get the amendment implemented.
So long as the electorate is a fractionated mob, the career politicians are safe.
Now, we will change that. We are changing the rules back in our favor. We have the power; we have never successfully united to harness that power - UNTIL NOW
#WeThePeople
#TermLimitRevolution
#Bipartisan
One issue politics is where votes are based on one issue and one issue alone.
There is no allegiance to ANY party. The only concern is the one issue.
#TermLimits
Back in 1918, NO PARTY had claimed Prohibition for their platform, therefore no one party owned it.
It was used by a SMALL GROUP OF ONLY 15% of the voters to get Prohibition passed.
15% !!!!
#TermLimits
To prevent this from ever happening again, our professional politicians divvied up the issues. Today, each party has taken a side in each of the hot button issues. This way, the power of the one issue voter has been stripped away.
#TermLimits
Pro-choice : votes Democratic.
Pro-life = R
Pro-gun = R
Having a hard line stance on these issues allows politicians on both sides an established voter base.
What the two parties have done is split the issues so that no one issue can be used against them
This allowed the one issue politics of the Prohibitionists to be a major force in electing our officials. This small group that was made up of only 15% of the population accomplished this using diversity, unity, and commitment.
#TermLimits
With over 82% of the population in favor of #termlimits, the #TermLimitRevolution can use one issue politics to adopt the term limit amendment.
Is our system a system of the PEOPLE or a system of POLITICAL ARISTOCRACY ?
#WeThePeople
A major reason that one issue politics WILL work is that #TermLimits is NOT a POLITICAL issue, it is an issue of the STRUCTURE of our government.
Professional politicians need the voters split on political issues, it keeps them in office.
Through a total commitment to this cause, coupled with unified and very diverse members, the #TermLimitRevolution will prevail.
One issue politics can be used to force this governmental change.
#WeThePeople
#Bipartisan
During the days before Prohibition, only 15% of the country supported the Prohibition Act. Only 15%!
The Prohibitionists threw aside all other issues and political affiliation.
They only voted for people who supported Prohibition.
The key to this was voting solely on this one issue. This same commitment coupled with diversity and unity can be used to easily enact term limits.
The implementation of term limits can only come through a TOTAL COMMITMENT to this cause
If one party decides to make term limits part of their platform, then the other party has no choice but to follow suit.
#TermLimitRevolution
We must put our partisanship aside and vote for only those politicians who have committed to passing the term limit amendment.
NEVER vote for someone who has not committed to passing term limits.
#Bipartisan
Temporarily put aside partisan politics and vote to get term limits.
If the #TermLimitRevolution is only fought by Republicans, then the Democrats in Congress would not have any reason to act on term limits and vice versa.
We must be united.
The career politicians will try to divide the people in this movement into smaller groups that they can pit against one another.
Our UNITY will defeat them
If the career politicians understand that if they don’t vote for this they will be replaced, they will join the #TermLimitRevolution in droves.
If the Democrats don’t want to vote for a conservative Republican and their leading candidate in the race doesn’t back term limits, then vote them out in the primary.
The same goes for the Republicans.
Do not let ANY candidate who does not pledge their support to term limits survive the primary.
DEMAND YOUR CANDIDATE SIGN THE @USTermLimits PLEDGE
TermLimits.com
#TermLimitRevolution
If your party’s nominee signs the pledge and the other party’s candidate won’t, then your person should win by a landslide.
85% of #WeThePeople want term limits. The 18th amendment passed with just 15% support. The main thing the 15% knew was they had to be unified and committed.
We cannot, we must not, surrender in this #TermLimitRevolution
Don’t flinch
#ArticleV of the Constitution gives us the 2 ways:
- #Congress writes and passes the amendment, then it goes to the states for ratification.
Or
- two-thirds of the states submit applications to Congress for a convention to propose amendments
The President of the United States does not play any role in the process of amending the Constitution.
No President could write an executive order for #TermLimits
#ConventionOfStates
2/3’s of the states (34) need to call for a convention to propose amendments
All 50 states could send representatives
If an amendment is approved by the convention, it is then sent to the states. 38 states needed to ratify
Use both methods (push Congress AND push for a #COS ) to ensure success.
Leverage the popular support for #termlimits to ensure that at least one of the variations of the amendment passes.
First, push for STRICT terms through a #ConventionOfStates - 3 terms = 6 years for the House and 2 terms = 12 years for Senate.
#COS approach -
This would count prior time in Congress against the term limit. It would block currently serving elected officials from running again if their cumulative years of service exceed 6 in the house or 12 in the senate
#COS approach
Plenty of state legislators would be qualified and able to run for Congress if this is passed, so they will see the benefit of open Congressional seats.
Congress will push back against this movement.
#Congress approach
The 2nd variation is the @USTermLimits Amendment that has been proposed 2 Congress & is less restrictive
3 terms= 6 yrs for House and 2 terms = 12 yrs Senate.
But it would NOT COUNT any terms prior served
Push forward on BOTH options. Both have 3 house & 2 senate terms. The difference is between Congress proposing the limits or states via #COS. Congress will want 2 do it b/c that way they would not count their previous terms
Every election cycle, candidates are given the US TL pledge: “I pledge that as a member of Congress I will cosponsor & vote for the U.S. Term Limits amendment of three (3) House terms and two (2) Senate terms & no longer limit.”
Only vote for candidates who have signed the pledge. If the incumbent you like has not signed, then primary that person. TermLimits.com keeps the log of who has signed
At the SAME TIME (NOW!) - PRESS YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS TO CALL FOR A LIMITED #ConventionOfStates FOR #TermLimits !
Once the states have called 4 an #ArticleV Convention, Congress will lose the option of passing it on their own
A #COS is a way for #WeThePeople to call #congress’ bluff... Once the number of States calling for a #conventionofstates approaches 30 - Congress will act and offer to do it themselves
And if the Amendment #Congress passes is SH!T, then the other 3 or 4 states will jump on and demand a #COS and be done with the nonsense... #WeThePeople will NOT be denied
#Winning
Voters : sign the voter petition at TermLimits.com . Your name will be added to a list of signers in your districts. This list will be forwarded onto the respective representative’s offices. This way, the elected officials can see the list grow and grow.
Again, Politicians who have not taken the candidate pledge must be targeted for defeat.