Some thoughts.
In fairness to him, Mr. Guha wasn't always this way – he called out whataboutery when he saw it. Here he hints that India's neurosis might not be Pakistan's.
(Of course, Modi hadn't become PM yet.)
This piece was widely critiqued.
asadrahim.com/2014/05/20/mod…
But even a historian like Guha fell in the same trap, thinking Nehru's lip service (while he sent Kashmiris to the dungeons) would keep the monsters at bay.
Only parallel for Pakistan: it's best for the left not to throw their lot in with vicious, decaying dynasties, and their idiot boy-kings. The results are unpredictable.
Short answer: no.
This is something unique to the electorate after Indira. Mass murder guarantees a thumping re-election victory; Rajiv's party in '84 and Modi in '02.
washingtonpost.com/archive/politi…
Jinnah's departure didn't make India go crazy – it was the horror of Hindu-majority India that made Jinnah leave.
Congress reduced the problem in '47 to a single lawyer that it called cold and communal.
Congress externalises the same problem today to a neighbouring country that has as much to do with Assam as Shashi has to do with cogent arguments.
Pakistan fought militancy (at least) since 2007. In many ways, it's still fighting. The tide turned when it was diagnosed – these demons were our own.
But India has chosen to elect its demons. It's time for a better diagnosis.