My Authors
Read all threads
Exciting AM talk by @HollyLynchez
2 issues: paying people to be in research & people paying to be in research
Why is #clinicaltrial under-enrollment problematic?
“Even if it doesn’t improve recruitment & retention to research, I think we should be paying participants on the grounds of fairness.”
US federal regs silent re issues of payment for research participation
IRBs very worried about high payments to research participants; idea that offer “too good to refuse” invalidates informed consent. IRBs not really focused on risks of underpaying
Paying research participants isn’t coercive. It may be unduly influential. IRBs are charged with preventing undue influence
(My phone is dying, must stop the livetweet. Argh, sorry!!)
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Dr. Alison Bateman-House

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!