Re. #abpse performance measures:
In its research for the Mackinnon panel, KPMG included a table on "Innovative Models" in PSE.
Tying funding to labor market outcomes was at the top. "Known/Identified Results" was marked "N/A." "Further Information/Source" was "Fraser Institute."
In its research for the Mackinnon panel, KPMG included a table on "Innovative Models" in PSE.
Tying funding to labor market outcomes was at the top. "Known/Identified Results" was marked "N/A." "Further Information/Source" was "Fraser Institute."
Under the table is this note: "This information does not represent KPMG’s advice or opinion."
Source: open.alberta.ca/publications/r…, pp. 126-127
Source: open.alberta.ca/publications/r…, pp. 126-127
In other words, according to the _government's own commissioned research_(!), @demetriosnAB is embarking on an experiment that has _no_ evidence of having worked elsewhere, but __is_ supported by the partisan and not-credible Fraser Institute.
Ugh. #abpse
Ugh. #abpse
And yet, you know what? It's actually the _least_ damaging thing they've done in the #abpse portfolio since taking government in May 2019 -- less damaging than the budget cuts based on false data, or the constant statements running down confidence in the system, for ex.
Ugh.
Ugh.
