My Authors
Read all threads
”But if coronavirus isn’t that deadly -80% unite fine,20% in hospital, 5% in intensive care I’ve read-why freak out?“
“The hospitals that already struggles to cope as in you mean?“
At a time when climate change is changing the conditions (for instance melting permafrost: old or new disease could (re)appear) wouldn’t it make sense to make sure healthcare systems run at least 20% under capacity so they can cope with anything new @who?
Pandemic fund anyone?
Could we integer that in the “healthcare is too expensive savings must be made” rhetoric people?
Pandemics are way more expensive.
And there’s no way to be ready other than actually being ready.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Facts Central

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!