On the #market lessons stemming from the pandemic, I suggested that- stepping back- while a lot has been thrown at the #economy and markets over the past 30 years, in every case the #policy response has been critical to evaluate in judging the ultimate impact: policy matters!
That said, we think there is an overestimation of the importance of exceedingly low #policy rate levels to the recovery but maintaining the stability and #liquidity of the financing #markets is critical, particularly at the top end of the capital stack.
Interestingly, some also underestimate the resilience and dynamism embedded within the U.S. economy, so aside from a possible resurgence of Covid, as variants proliferate, and slowing growth in China, my main concern at the moment is the complacency exhibited by markets.
On the @federalreserve’s next moves, we think the #Fed is in the process of pivoting policy accommodation, and we will see asset purchase #tapering announced by the end of this year and policy #rates could begin to move higher by the end of next year.
This potential, of course, has resulted in endless discussion in the media about the 2013 #TaperTantrum, which has resulted in some degree of consternation, but when examined closely, what real long-term harm did this event truly cause?
For instance, while the #LaborMarket has been slowly recovering today, when looking at the 2013 #tantrum, it didn’t show up in the #payroll figures in any notable manner.
Further, the “Tantrum” didn’t slow the @ism Manufacturing PMI in any appreciable way either…
Finally, despite all the handwringing, the largest #equity#market drawdown in 2013 (looking at the #SPX) was 5.6%, and the year represented one of the least volatile on record, with the index not touching its 200 day moving average for the longest stretch since 1997.
All told, we think that overly aggressive #monetary and #fiscal policies today, if allowed to persist, could risk further distortions to market prices and potentially place at #risk the progress that’s been made in the recovery.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today’s robust #inflation data surprised in its strength and will likely persist in the short-run, and in some areas the intermediate-term, although we think that long-term the @federalreserve is largely correct in identifying real #economy price gains as mostly #transitory.
Much of today’s #inflation is due to reopening factors and supply constraints, but as #SupplyChains normalize from Covid-related shocks and #inventories rebuild, we expect much of the recent inflation will be transitory, with some stickiness in pricing pressure longer-run.
That may be especially the case where #inventory levels are harder to build up quickly and continued #demand from higher levels of #growth persist for at least the next year, or so.
At yesterday’s #FOMC meeting, the Committee revealed more expected tightening and further steps toward #tapering#asset purchases than they had previously. We see these as steps in the right direction.
Yesterday’s @federalreserve statement and press conference suggest that the Committee believes progress has been made toward its goals, but that there’s still some room to go to hit the recently re-defined objective of maximum #employment.
Still, it’s now time to set up for the end of this long-running #EmergencyPolicy-focused movie.
In our latest @BlackRock Market Insights commentary we argue that #inflation’s role in the #economic order can be misinterpreted, and therefore that #policy seeking to achieve positive ends can ironically become the means by which those ends are undone: bit.ly/3fyLn4O
Today, policymakers face a set of increasingly critical choices that could end up shaping our quality of life for a generation. Changes to the #Fed’s #inflation framework, without being fully debated, may ironically end up exacerbating the very problems they seek to alleviate.
One might paraphrase the #Fed mandate of full employment and stable prices as being intended “to preserve the purchasing power of as many as possible” – or, to create the best quality of life for the community. So, how do varying levels of #inflation impact that mandate?
The #economy and #markets today present us with a type of confusing environment: a tremendous growth rebound amid concerns over different forms of #overheating due to policy being late to normalize, and then the uncertainty of an ultimately harsher policy unwind down the road…
… It’s in this kind of environment that we find that what #investors want to do can be very different from what they need to do – the opposite, or mirror image, in fact: bit.ly/3u0nmr9
Over the last decade, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. High Yield Index has traded in a #yield range of about 4% to 12%, and both those extremes have come during the pandemic period (the last 14 months).
While our February 18th monthly client call argument for rising #RealRates appeared prescient, we were surprised by the magnitude of last week’s #move and would expect a more benign evolution toward #equilibrium going forward.
Taking a stab at periodizing the past year: 1) in Feb/Mar 2020 the Covid crisis was priced into #markets, real #rates spiked higher, #inflation breakevens collapsed and #investors scrambled to raise #cash as the #SPX experienced its fastest 30% drawdown in history.
Then, 2) from Apr through Oct 2020 we witnessed the #market impact of monumental #monetary and #fiscal policy responses to the #crisis, as policymakers successfully sought to force #real rates down and restore #inflation expectations.
Second, @RobertJShiller published a significant update to his widely followed #CAPE model: subtracting the real #yield on #USTs from the reciprocal of the CAPE ratio to show what an #equity#investor may expect to earn over #risk-free #bonds, in real terms based on #market price.