At yesterday’s #FOMC meeting, the Committee revealed more expected tightening and further steps toward #tapering#asset purchases than they had previously. We see these as steps in the right direction.
Yesterday’s @federalreserve statement and press conference suggest that the Committee believes progress has been made toward its goals, but that there’s still some room to go to hit the recently re-defined objective of maximum #employment.
Still, it’s now time to set up for the end of this long-running #EmergencyPolicy-focused movie.
Even with the eventual #tapering of #AssetPurchases, and subsequent moderate increase in interest rates, we think it’s clear that the backdrop for the #economy will generate significant employment improvement.
The #Fed surprised #markets and some commentators revealing the Committee assumes more #InterestRate increases than previously. We think that is the right move, and the assumptions of the appropriate funds rate saw a wholesale upward revision in 2023.
The median participant now assumes two interest #rate increases in 2023, a step in the right direction.
Importantly, we also learned that the #Fed appreciates that its newly set #inflation target of ‘above 2 percent for some time’ is closer to being achieved.
Indeed, #breakeven inflation levels of roughly 2.40% at 5 years and 2.30% at 10 years suggest that longer-term #InflationExpectations seem to be well anchored in the general view of market participants.
As we have described elsewhere, we don’t think that #QEtapering will create tangible stress to the economy or #markets, and in fact think that the biggest risk today would be an #overheating paradigm where it’s hard to predict how high input, or wage, costs could get.
Markets are likely to adjust accordingly in some areas, such as extremely distorted #RealRates across much of the #yield curve, but we believe the #markets will ultimately cheer a return to normalcy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In our latest @BlackRock Market Insights commentary we argue that #inflation’s role in the #economic order can be misinterpreted, and therefore that #policy seeking to achieve positive ends can ironically become the means by which those ends are undone: bit.ly/3fyLn4O
Today, policymakers face a set of increasingly critical choices that could end up shaping our quality of life for a generation. Changes to the #Fed’s #inflation framework, without being fully debated, may ironically end up exacerbating the very problems they seek to alleviate.
One might paraphrase the #Fed mandate of full employment and stable prices as being intended “to preserve the purchasing power of as many as possible” – or, to create the best quality of life for the community. So, how do varying levels of #inflation impact that mandate?
The #economy and #markets today present us with a type of confusing environment: a tremendous growth rebound amid concerns over different forms of #overheating due to policy being late to normalize, and then the uncertainty of an ultimately harsher policy unwind down the road…
… It’s in this kind of environment that we find that what #investors want to do can be very different from what they need to do – the opposite, or mirror image, in fact: bit.ly/3u0nmr9
Over the last decade, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. High Yield Index has traded in a #yield range of about 4% to 12%, and both those extremes have come during the pandemic period (the last 14 months).
While our February 18th monthly client call argument for rising #RealRates appeared prescient, we were surprised by the magnitude of last week’s #move and would expect a more benign evolution toward #equilibrium going forward.
Taking a stab at periodizing the past year: 1) in Feb/Mar 2020 the Covid crisis was priced into #markets, real #rates spiked higher, #inflation breakevens collapsed and #investors scrambled to raise #cash as the #SPX experienced its fastest 30% drawdown in history.
Then, 2) from Apr through Oct 2020 we witnessed the #market impact of monumental #monetary and #fiscal policy responses to the #crisis, as policymakers successfully sought to force #real rates down and restore #inflation expectations.
Second, @RobertJShiller published a significant update to his widely followed #CAPE model: subtracting the real #yield on #USTs from the reciprocal of the CAPE ratio to show what an #equity#investor may expect to earn over #risk-free #bonds, in real terms based on #market price.
The turn of the calendar year invites the temptation to prognosticate regarding the course of the year ahead for the #economy and for #markets, and not being immune to that impulse, here are our views on the “11 themes to consider as we look toward 2021:” bit.ly/386mb0r
In preview, one key theme is that 2021’s nominal #GDP growth is likely to surprise many skeptics with its strength. The sources of upside surprise can be found in: 1) the new #fiscal#stimulus combined with structural budget #deficits…
And in 2) the @federalreserve’s ongoing asset purchases and 3) the impressive #economic momentum that is still broadly underestimated, as a post-election, and #pandemic-recovering world can catalyze 2020/21’s monetized #stimulus (more than 15% of GDP) into impressive NGDP growth.
As we head into the U.S. #election, there will continue to be a lot of noise that may lead to near-term #market#volatility, particularly since (as we’ve long argued) #markets appear to be able to only focus on one thing at a time!
Still, at times like this it’s crucial to focus on more consequential factors that will drive #markets in the years ahead: in this case, the powerful combination of @federalreserve#monetarypolicy and #fiscal rescue measures intended to keep the #economic engine on track.
So, while many will continue to be skeptical of the sustainability of this #economic recovery, we’ve been impressed by its strength, particularly in the #interest-rate-sensitive segments of the #economy, like #housing, which is going through the roof!