So, I personally subscribe to the school of thought that Trump is a genius and that he is many, many "moves" ahead of his enemies.
What if during their discussion off air (can't come firm what was said on air since all videos are yanked, like this: businessinsider.com/donald-trump-i…) he said to Alex "They're going to come for you. They're going to come so hard your head will be spinning."
Trump: "But watch, when they do, they'll wish they never even looked at you. Just watch. Do what you would do (file legal complaint) like normal, 'I will not let you down' "
The last part "I will not let you down" was said on video.
This makes me think, what if the Justice Department picks up the case of Alex Jones/Infowars and uses it to beat back the "hate speech" rhetoric that has taken over the left?
This makes me think, what if the Justice Department picks up the case of Alex Jones/Infowars and uses it to beat back the "hate speech" rhetoric that has taken over the left?
The Justice Dept has already picked up/joined college Republicans in their suits regarding Free Speech.
Freedom of speech is precious and rare in this world. It is one of the reasons that America is exceptional. But it is also fragile.
I believe that we have a responsibility to honor the Constitution—and to preserve this heritage of freedom of speech for your generation.
I believe that we have a responsibility to honor the Constitution—and to preserve this heritage of freedom of speech for your generation.
Under President Trump’s strong leadership, this Department of Justice is doing its part to protect our Republic by protecting this right.
We are going to court to protect students across America—and we are winning.
We are going to court to protect students across America—and we are winning.
The University of California Berkeley allegedly applied a stricter set of rules for inviting public speakers to conservative student organizations than for other campus groups. Under the school’s policy, administrators appeared to have almost complete discretion over the times,
places, and conditions of hosting campus guest speakers. That discretion allowed them to apply different rules to different people in an arbitrary and capricious way.
A group of students argue that that’s precisely what administrators did. They allege that by placing unrealistically burdensome requirements on conservative speakers—but not on other speakers—
the school effectively discriminated against them and made it impossible for them to speak. But all must have the chance to speak.
. . .
. . .
This is truly a mainstream defense against a radical, ahistorical, and unconstitutional threat that must be defeated. It is time to put a stake in its heart.
***End excerpt****
***End excerpt****
With actions like the above happening already, essentialy a trial run, why wouldn't they change the scope and take on the next biggest hurdle?
All this being said, doesn't it seem like this may have been planned? @ThomasWictor's Judas Goat theory fits perfectly.
All this being said, doesn't it seem like this may have been planned? @ThomasWictor's Judas Goat theory fits perfectly.
