Let's compare UK of 1500 with India of 1931 - both fairly poor pre-industrial societies with similar per-capita incomes
(Contd..)
Male : ~10%
Female ~2%
So that's a multiple of 5
1931 Literacy rates in India
Male : 15.6%
Female : 2.9%
Multiple of 5!
So in what respect was Indian culture less willing to educate women than similar societies elsewhere?
Male : 43.7%
Female: 9.6%
Multiple of < 5
The multiple is actually better than all India multiple of a little over 5
Madras Brahman : Male - 80%, Female : 29% (Multiple of 2.75)
Mysore Brahman : Male - 78%, Female : 34% (Multiple of 2.3)
Bengal Brahman : Male - 64%, Female : 22%, (Multiple of 2.9)
All these multiples way better than average
Lingayats - Male (30.1%), Female (2.2%) (Multiple : 14)
Vokkaliga - Male (12.2%), Female (0.5%) (Multiple : 24)
Maratha - Male (22.3%), Female (2.8%) (Multiple : 8)
Multiples way worse than average!
So the so-called "inter-sectionality" between patriarchy and "upper caste hegemony" as claimed by commentators (@bdutt most recently in a tweet) is bogus in my view
Some may baulk at the use of literacy rates to make statements on "patriarchy". But it is the best proxy we have. It is always good to use some data as opposed to engaging in a purely rhetorical data-free discussion
www1.umassd.edu/ir/resources/l…
The rest of the numbers come from 1931 census. A more detailed piece of mine on the census is here -
swarajyamag.com/ideas/census-1…