We are arguing that it does impact performance and explain SOME of the difference between men and women.
But more so: That Testosterone is a surrogate divider of sex.
Why is it used as a marker? Because the overlap between male and females is minimal. Just about Zero XX women have natural testosterone levels that reach the even the low male levels.
So it's used as a surrogate marker for sex to divide.
What the article does is confuse Testosterone being correlated with performance and its impact on performance.
Whether or not it is correlated with performance depends on the group being sampled.
Why? Performance is complex! No one factors explains much of performance, it doesn't mean that it doesn't matter.
-A large % of the sample is doped which artificially raises and lowers T levels in blood samples
-Fatigue, when samples are taken, etc.
Distance athletes if doing high volume will suppress some Testosterone because of training load.
That doesn't mean Testosterone doesn't help performance
-We know from studies of athletes on steroids int he 1980's that artificial Testosterone boosted 800m performance in women by 5-7 seconds. That's incredible at the highest level.
That data alone shows the impact T has on a singular athletes performance.
Articles like this distract and take us away from the main issue of DSD and Semenya.
Testosterone is a surrogate marker. It absolutely plays a large role in performance. BUT is it the best marker to separate sport by sexes? No idea.
The reality is because of testosterone (and other factors) the IAAF is faced with trying to protect the majority of women.
It's an impossible task. But we need smart minds on that question, NOT whether or not testosterone helps performance...