Run-scoring has hinted at winners in previous World Cups.
I have more on that in a thread on England.
Read that here:
India hit a 4/6 every 9.74 balls, again behind England (also an all-time high of 8.44 balls) and South Africa (9.67).
Kohli, Rohit, Shikhar have 10944 runs – 52% of the team’s runs, underlining the team’s dependence on them.
@imVkohli reigns supreme – 4379 runs, 61.41 runs in 63.46 balls per outing, 19 hundreds, and a boundary every 9.77 balls. The world's best.
He’s India’s most consistent boundary hitter, with one every 7.16 ball.
After this, things get trickier.
The No. 4 slot is a problem. In 79 innings, India have tried 12 players who’ve scored
2411 runs (ranked 5/10 of the teams at this World Cup)
at an average of 37.09 (ranked 7/10).
He’s made 63 runs in 6 innings batting at 3, 4, 5 with a highest of 26.
But we know he’s a much better opener – 280 runs in 7.
In came @vijayshankar260 – showing promise but just 9 games old. His numbers aren't much to base any conclusions on. I wish him well.
We can fill up a book talking about @msdhoni and his weaponized wicketkeeping.
His superhuman line stumpings and run-outs gives India an edge.
His batting clearly isn’t what it used to be.
Since then, he’s scored at 4.88 – well below India’s run rate of 5.47 in the same period.
But the firepower will have to come from somewhere else.
For India, he’s ahead only of Chahal, Bumrah, Bhuvi, Kuldeep, Jadeja, Rahul, and Karthik on that metric.
Of the 150 players at the World Cup, he ranks 105 on that metric.
But amazingly Karthik’s numbers – 4.51 runs per over, 14.49 balls per boundary – are worse than Dhoni.
I just hope there are few games in which he needs to bat more than 20 overs.
Finally, the balance is provided by @hardikpandya7 who brings in much-needed firepower.
Hardik scores at 7.00 per over (best in India), with a 4 or 6 every 7.46 balls (best after Dhawan at 7.16).
If he makes an impact with the ball, well and good.
Since 2015, his 32 games have yielded 31 wickets (at 48.32; ER 5.01) and with the bat he’s averaged 14.10 runs off 17.40 balls per.
Summary: India have the strongest 1, 2, 3 on paper.
But England, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan have stronger 4-7.
Further down, India have a tail that can’t bat for its life.
Their 8-11 are supremely skilled bowlers who are also extraordinarily bad batsmen.
Just how bad?
- Scored 963 runs (ranked 10/10 of the World Cup teams)
- Batted 10.24 balls per game (ranked 9/10)
- Scored 7.64 runs per game (10/10)
- Hit a 4/6 every 14.18 balls, & 91 boundaries in all (both 10/10)
- Scored at just 4.48/over (8/10)
Kohli can't win the Cup on his own.
Lucky for India, they are travelling with the strongest group of bowlers to ever don the blue.
In @Jaspritbumrah93, @MdShami11, @imkuldeep18, @yuzi_chahal and Bhuvi, and Jadeja, Hardik, Jadhav for back-up, India all bases covered.
Since CWC 2015, India have struck once every 36.7 balls.
The CWC-winning Australian squads of 2003 and 2007 averaged 36.5 each, and 37.00 in 2015.
The 2015 South Africa squad leads the way with 7.51.
Afghanistan did better, but they played largely against non-qualifiers.
Based on these numbers they should finish in the top 4, and if the batting can shrug off its weaknesses, then a top 2 finish would be well deserved.