,
7 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
If there is no ban on meat, ban on animal sacrifice is illogical.
It is ok to slaughter an animal callously for meat but not ok to do it reverentially?
The aim is clear—to kill a native practice while mass slaughter by the meat industry and on #Bakrid goes unchallenged.
It is ok to slaughter an animal callously for meat but not ok to do it reverentially?
The aim is clear—to kill a native practice while mass slaughter by the meat industry and on #Bakrid goes unchallenged.
The Tripura ban is simply one more Church attack on native traditions at par with #jallikattu and #Sabarimala. This must be reversed.
#SaveOurTripurasundari
#SaveOurSabarimala
indiafacts.org/dahi-handi-deb…
#SaveOurTripurasundari
#SaveOurSabarimala
indiafacts.org/dahi-handi-deb…
Hindu dharma has a diversity of practices. Enforcing one model is an Abrahamic commandment based idea. Respect different traditions.
Then you have no ideas of the shakta traditions or the aghoris or many other sects. You want to push them all out of Hinduism? On what authority?
Yes, I am a vegetarian by there is no such normative injunction in Hinduism. Not how it works.
Yes, I am a vegetarian by there is no such normative injunction in Hinduism. Not how it works.
First learn the difference between traditions and religion. Traditions are evolutionary local wisdom. Religions are rigid “God’s commandments.”
Secondly #Bakrid mass slaughter on a single day is wasteful & environmentally damaging.
Secondly #Bakrid mass slaughter on a single day is wasteful & environmentally damaging.
Isn’t Parmeshwar already happy? What gave you the idea the rituals have anything to do with making parameshwar happy or unhappy? You seem to keep projecting the wrathful Abrahamic god onto Hindus.
What is this Andhvishwas? Can you give me a single textual reference to this before colonialism? You are trying to translate “superstition” from Christian theology?
