,
6 tweets,
5 min read
Read on Twitter
News Analysis 🔎 The dangers facing @SpeakerPelosi and her party are the multiple “what ifs” that could make efforts to #ImpeachTrump the worst thing that can happen for the Democrats.
We decided to examine many of those "what ifs." (Thread 👇) theepochtimes.com/assessing-the-…
We decided to examine many of those "what ifs." (Thread 👇) theepochtimes.com/assessing-the-…
@SpeakerPelosi What if 🔎 @SpeakerPelosi’s Democrats are mistaken in gambling that, after they #ImpeachTrump, the majority Americans will reward them with full control of both chambers of Congress and the White House in the #2020Election?
The problem for everybody involved in a #TrumpImpeachment is nobody can know with assurance what effect it will have electorally because there are so many more “what ifs” that could, to a greater or lesser degree, shape the final outcome in 2020.
What if 🔎 Trump takes advantage of Senate rules to turn the #Impeachment trial into no-holds-barred investigations, with brutal cross-examinations of witnesses such as @HillaryClinton, @JoeBiden, and @BarackObama?
“Draining the swamp” could take on a whole new meaning.
“Draining the swamp” could take on a whole new meaning.
Assuming @SenateMajLdr #MitchMcConnell approves, Trump’s defense lawyers for the trial will have wide latitude to call witnesses and subpoena documents.
That could lead to devastating blows damaging Democrats for years to come.
That could lead to devastating blows damaging Democrats for years to come.
@senatemajldr What if 🔎 President Trump decides to declassify “everything” regarding the #RussiaHoax, #JoeBiden’s dealings with #China and #Ukraine, aspects of #HillaryClinton’s time as Secretary of state, and more?
Each of these possibilities opens up countless additional “what ifs.”
/END/
Each of these possibilities opens up countless additional “what ifs.”
/END/
