Fox News' own "Brain Room" has effectively concluded that @mmfa is a more accurate source for information about the Ukraine disinformation campaign than Sean Hannity or John Solomon.
Which, to be fair, is entirely accurate. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
Which, to be fair, is entirely accurate. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
@mmfa Read the @mmfa post that Fox's "Brain Room" cited here: mediamatters.org/john-solomon/h…
And my take on the Fox internal document and what it says about the network here: mediamatters.org/fox-news/leake…
And my take on the Fox internal document and what it says about the network here: mediamatters.org/fox-news/leake…
@mmfa You may think we are unfair, or obsessive. You may even hate us. But you can't argue with our data. Not even if you work at Fox News.
I've had my fun here. Let's take this in another direction.
If you are Fox viewer, and you want to know about the corrupt practices rampant on Hannity's show, you need to read @thedailybeast or @washingtonpost, or @mmfa.
Fox has all the facts, and they're hiding them from you.
If you are Fox viewer, and you want to know about the corrupt practices rampant on Hannity's show, you need to read @thedailybeast or @washingtonpost, or @mmfa.
Fox has all the facts, and they're hiding them from you.
Fox hosts spend a ton of time telling their audience that journalists at other outlets are corrupt liars. They need to do that, because:
