I get asked many times a day what the coronavirus means for global CO₂ emissions...
Short-answer: Its March, I don't know yet...
Long-answer: Emissions are probably going down...
theconversation.com/how-changes-br…
You may notice my numbers don't seem to add up, but differ by 0.3%? That is a leap year adjustment. Since 2020 has 366 days we should adjust growth rates (0.3% lower in 2020). Annoying, but important...
* We have no idea how the economy will develop in 2020. Big hits from coronavirus offset by big government stimulus.
* Carbon efficiency may do weird things because of government stimulus...
It is still only March!
We either lose a few years of growth or emissions rebound.
Structural changes get swamped (nuclear after oil crises)
rdcu.be/bOUaB
My armchair observation: It seems like a slow burner. Countries could lockdown for months, then open up again, only to lockdown when the virus flares up again. I don't see this stopping in a few months 😟
* Could we figure out that home office works, reducing local commuting?
* Could we figure way to do big conferences remotely, reducing aviation? The IPCC will try soon (I will be a part)
* Could government stimulus be directed in climate beneficial areas?
Perhaps we find that remote conferences are not that great? (Don't try unless you are going to make it work).
If anything, government support might build more ventilators...
We could be "lucky" in that we buy a little bit of time with low economic growth, allowing renewables to "catch up" with the annual addition in energy yes.
Perhaps 2019/2020 will be peak emissions?