,
5 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
I read @brianstelter's defense of MSNBC re the @yashar story. Then I read it again. It's like he accidentally pasted a paragraph from a different story. Who is challenging the network deals to broadcast debates?! What the hell is that quote from his source supposed to even mean? 
Networks have deals to broadcast debates, you say? And this has been happening for decades? Oh, that changes the whole thing. Now it makes sense that the MSNBC editor called @yashar on DNC's behalf. Because there are deals to broadcast debates, see?
The inside source can confirm! Telling a lot of people the information before it's released to the public is ok! Wait, what were we talking about again? Oh, yeah, the MSNBC editor berating @yashar to not publish his scoop to which this source's comment is completely irrelevant.
And the bolding of text, lol! Like, here is a paragraph that makes no sense and has no connection to the story and let me bold the text so you have the main takeaway: "completely in bounds and nothing more than run-of-the-mill event coordination done with both political parties."
IT'S TOTALLY FINE THAT AN EDITOR AT MSNBC CALLED @yashar ON DNC'S BEHALF. LET ME CAPITALIZE ALL OF THAT SO YOU KNOW.
