, 8 tweets, 2 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Globalism is a disaster for human rights. There is little evidence of oppressive regimes liberalizing due to "free trade." Instead, globalism gives oppressive regimes the economic muscle to stifle criticism of even the most egregious offenses, like China's concentration camps.
In theory, globalism would improve human rights by raising the standard of living in oppressed nations and making violent repression of unhappy citizens unnecessary. In practice, it produces wealth that is looted by corrupt elites and funneled into the machinery of oppression.
China got rich from globalism, and while the standard of life for many Chinese improved dramatically, that wealth was also used to finance the creation of the most pervasive, sophisticated, inescapable surveillance state the world has ever seen.
Globalism makes it harder for civilized nations to refuse commercial and cultural engagement with oppressive and savage regimes. The net effect is lowering - really all but eliminating - the standards for accessing the lucrative economies of free nations.
Trade was supposed to lead to cultural engagement that would inevitably bring Western values to oppressive regimes. Instead the opposite happened. Totalitarian ideals and practices are seeping into free nations. We must compromise our values to keep doing business with THEM.
One of the many problems with bowing to authoritarian demands to maintain access to their lucrative markets is that domestic actors begin wondering why they can't get the same consideration for THEIR speech codes that Beijing can compel for those of the Chinese Communist Party.
The past few years have seen American cancel culture adopt the same kind of "sharp power" tactics to compel obedience from corporations that China has been using. The language U.S. pressure groups use is almost identical to Chinese Communist boilerplate.
A generation ago, we missed a rare opportunity to make meaningful political reform the price for accessing the wealth created by classical liberalism, because we assumed that wealth carried a viral payload of classical liberal ideals. We were horribly mistaken. /end
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with John Hayward

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!