Directness & saying what you mean is important. The receiver also needs to be ready to tolerate this. Society & business places tend to prefer the passive aggressive so being direct does invoke blowback.
“Be kind” is red flag: it identifies the passive aggressive shushing/shaming people who are threatened by @candor & perceive directness as aggression. It’s a fixed mindset trait or a negative consequence when empathy/emotions overindexed in ways to block growth & learning.
Growth, learning, honesty are all inherently uncomfortable. “Civility” has a sinister side of suppressing anything or anyone who triggers another’s discomfort. Civility mislabels & shames change agents to protect the status quo vs disruption/improvement).
From my own time in #compliance, observed that a barrier to critical thinking & open debate is who is put into these roles: “nice”, rule-enforcing, women bring a gender-driven suppressive “civility” culture, suppressing creativity
& can be anti-#DEI even law.com/corpcounsel/20…
That women in #compliance have adapted to this reality
is not necessarily “their fault”
they themselves become perfectionist, as a result of their experience as women, unwilling to embrace #growthmindset & failure
#Compliance field will select for perfectionists & #perfectionism & #impostersyndrome which tend to be negative, traits, actually, though often wrongly equated with #professionalism. If you believe *you* are unworthy/do not belong, & in compliance/#HR, what culture do you drive?
Also, at midcareer female success is threatening to men our age AND to younger men who rely on patriarchal patronage systems. Women, overpoliced by the system, then, yes, are tougher bosses AND we *do* tend to adhere more closely to ethics.
On #MedTwitter there is a pattern of “callouts”, yes vs all genders & ages, but also pattern of misogyny and misogynoir. It happens towards nurses & doctors alike. One of the reasons I connected with @ShrimpBrokkoli is because I saw a yt male resident ridiculing her online.
I saw that behavior being taught by NON-clinical faculty & that REALLY crossed a line.
If you are a woman + nurse + frontline + Black/WOC, you already live with so much violence towards you. Added online made up drama from a trainee vs nurse?
No, no, & no. webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/…
Thing is… even prior to #COVID19, it was known that viral shedding can occur in feces up to 3 weeks or longer. Isolation periods have always been subjective. That said, for airborne spread, there is a need to take precautions while infectious in that way #Omicron
“duration of viral shedding in infected pediatric patients. Virus was detectable for a mean (SD) of 17.6 (6.7) days overall and was detectable for a prolonged period of time in all cohorts of children”
As a #vaccine & #publichealth advocate I *always* respond to any question with sincerity. Since I got put on lists of pro-#DEI/#equity/#BLM docs to target is anonymous accounts will “@“ me then when I respond in good faith it is tallied as my “harassing” = manufacture fake #data.
If do not leave on own
manufactured/fake outrage or drama or
internal lobbying relationships/political pressure
⬇️
to get dedicated #publichealth officials fired
Good question. Not everyone in #SciComm is actually equipped either, is the issue, as there is no credentialing, training, or gatekeeping of quality on #science#communication, much of which is #marketing or reputation management for hospitals & for profit #healthcare companies.
In particular, there is a real dearth of credible, reliable #publichealth#communication & #scicomm. Much of what I have seen called as “SciComm” is “personal brand” & #marketing a private practice for revenue goals. Critical thinking or unbiased communication is still lacking.
Keep in mind just how prevalent gossip & smears & vicious rivalries are in #academia. Do we trust *these* people to responsibly #communicate to the public on delicate issues?
This is happening in U.S. & U.K. Once I got to the management & C-suite, especially in #NYC, I was unwilling to send #HCW into unsafe spaces to be injured or die.
The frontline is disproportionately POC, women. Those making guidelines or in C-suite are able to protect themselves. Leadership manipulates data/definitions, then shames, gaslights. Non-clinicians hired to override #HCW with “opinion.” Those at frontline who speak up: fired.
Who is among these flags (& whose loved ones)? It is not those pushing out pre-prints or on TV nor those safely behind a screen from a second home. It is those at the frontline, working without support, protection, or even without pay (some hospitals asking docs to volunteer).
This is what targeted racial harassment looks like: nitpicking things like “smiled” or “wore clothes like a celebrity, as a celebrity” or “bought cookware.” It is part of the “gold digger” narrative.
This is common in #healthcare “#professionalism” where there is hazing & bullying by racist &/or classist made up non-rules lacking standards…yet people are called “breaking the rules.”
It’s exactly how bullies operate: double standards, mislabel/smear, exclude, marginalize.
In the U.K., “BAME” includes the formerly colonized, thus making race constructs or power different from U.S. as latter had race-based chattel slavery.
Thing is, those formerly colonized have many who have internalized self hate & racism.