1)When one consistently gets vital statistical infor wrong on an election, not only on twitter, but consistently in their 'ground-breaking' book, one wonders what else they are manufacturing in the bk. Zim has 1958 wards, not 1985. I don't know where the extra 27 are coming from.
2) Isn't "Excelgate" mutating into a "Wardgate" where the earthshattering 'electoral fraud' exposé is ironically based on a fictitious result transmission story from non-existant 1985 wards?
3)I don't doubt there was electoral fraud in 2018 elections but getting wrong, an important statistic in an election like the total number of wards from where the purported fake results were transmitted is fatal. Getting it wrong once might be a typo,but 5 times is unpardonable.
4)Repeating the same mistake on Twitter, months after the publication of the bk is even disastrous. If one chooses to base their argument on transmission of results from wards, fraudulently adding 27 wards on top of the the 1958 used in the election makes them as culpable as ZEC
(5) 27 wards, easily translate to 162 polling stations using the average of 6 polling stations per ward considering the 10895 polling stations in the 1958 wards in the 2018 elections. An analysis of electoral fraud adding fake 162 polling stations is fraudulent to say the least.
