,
8 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
'the source was alarmed by the general’s apparent closeness with a Russian woman who was also in attendance. The concern was strong enough that it prompted another person to pass on a warning to the American authorities that Mr. Flynn could be compromised by Russian intelligence.
.@AllMattNYT so with everything you knew in 2018 when you published this, and with everything you know now, you stand by this reporting?
I am still waiting @AllMattNYT
.@AllMattNYT you have gone very quiet. are you ok?
are you working up some more 'sympathy'? @AllMattNYT
Hey @AllMattNYT let me help you! Get your editor to large apology. Stating, for the record, that the New York Times regrets that they omitted to mention certain pertinent facts in their reporting that were known to them at the time. As a result, they misled their readers (1)
2/3 Your editor should add, @AllMattNYT : 'NYT deeply regrets causing severe harm to Ms Lokhova and Gen Flynn. For the avoidance of doubt Ms Lokhova does not and has never worked for or has any connection with Russian Intelligence and could never compromised @GenFlynn Further,
3/3 'we were at the time of publication aware that Stef Halper was an unreliable source. Our reporter, @AllMattNYT knew that @GenFlynn is a devoted family man and would never be compromised.' SIMPLE, YES? @AllMattNYT @nytimes
