THAT IS VERY CLEAR BECAUSE HE'S CONSISTENTLY MISREPRESENTED MUELLER'S REASONING
Then he says his letter summarized Mueller's BOTTOM LINE CONCLUSIONS
These two statements are in conflict.
Barr is trying to drive some kind of distinction between not accurately summarizing and lying
Barr quickly pivots to attacking the New York Times.
This flatly false and he's having trouble defending it.
THIS IS THE ENTIRE BASIS OF BARR DECIDING THERE WAS NO OBSTRUCTION
MUELLER SAYS THE EXACT OPPOSITE IN THE REPORT
Basically, Barr says he gave a false statement because he didn't understand the question
Barr says there is nothing wrong with telling former aides not to cooperate and dangling pardons if they comply
An obvious lie. Shameless.
Sign up at popular.info