Thread by @StillDelvingH

Why is it than, when someone explains me it's perfectly OK for the IEA not to say who its funders are or for Kate Andrews not to say she's part of Trump's team (beginning of the conversation), it always ends up with a link to an Atlas Network think tank and/or John Bolton?

https://twitter.com/StillDelvingH/status/1128240176399044609

(Note that, fortunatelly, this little conversation did not rattle anyone nor triggered a compulsive need to distort, divert and dismiss to take attention away from Ernst Roets.)
(So who are Roets' partners/sponsors?)

Now guess who happens to be linked to the Cato Institute and Heritage Foundation ("coincidentially" linked to the IEA through the Atlas Network/same staff/funders/the common agenda they push -"coincidentially" pulling for their funders' interests) ?
Roets.
africasacountry.com/2018/05/flight…

Now guess who is pushing the "South Africa white genocide" conspiracy alongside Roets/AfriForum?
(The Kremlin + Murdoch News Corps? What were the odds...)
@carolecadwalla @peterjukes @PeterKGeoghegan smh.com.au/world/oceania/…

So you know maybe Roets/AfriForum, as the official "witnesses" in South Africa of what has become a global conspiracy theory, from Russia to Trump to Katie Hopkins to Alex Jones to Brittany Pettibone to Lauren Southern to Alexander Dugin (aso), are worth our attention.

(Re: Kremlin Interference in South Africa, please note that, as always, the "playing both side" strategy has been used.)
businesstech.co.za/news/governmen…