,
10 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
...viewpoints or whatever.
And explain to people what happens if your moderators stop or even just police stuff 10% over the line and ignore all that's on it. I know what happens, but I think people and Congress need to hear this all from platforms.
And explain to people what happens if your moderators stop or even just police stuff 10% over the line and ignore all that's on it. I know what happens, but I think people and Congress need to hear this all from platforms.
Also -
Lots more data: transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/… 
Government requests to remove content transparencyreport.google.com/government-rem…
My point isn't that platforms ought to be immune from criticism, but that to understand everything, you REALLY need to understand what content moderation entails. HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of posts
I'm not even kidding - I once did community management (basically content moderation, for our purposes) for a candidate years ago, and messed up DAY 1. It's a hard as hell job
And finally, replied to my tweets here have said the obvious solution is:
- Don't moderate any content, even illegal
- Only moderate illegal content
- Moderate illegal and bad content
ALMOST like everyone disagrees so yelling at platforms to be inhumanly flawless is idiotic
- Don't moderate any content, even illegal
- Only moderate illegal content
- Moderate illegal and bad content
ALMOST like everyone disagrees so yelling at platforms to be inhumanly flawless is idiotic
