, 17 tweets, 10 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
I want to share a new paper. Its relevant to #GE2019. The findings are quite exemplary of the misguidedness of much of economic & social policy under the #ConservativeParty. It should be a harbinger to wary voters: there is more of the same under the Tories & with #Brexit. 1/..
The short summary: the reform to housing benefit from 2011 onwards was intended to save the public purse hundreds of millions. But quite the reverse happened: not only did it create huge amounts of misery and agony, it also ended up not saving the public much money at all. 2/..
What happened? From April 2011 onwards, local housing allowance was massively cut from covering up to the median level of rents, to only cover up to the 30th percentile of market rents. Here is a map of how this affected households in terms of expected losses per week. 3/..
On average, households in private rented sector PRS lost GBP 500 per year. In urban areas, particularly London the loss amounted to easily up GBP 2400 per year. Across the UK, an estimated 700k-1 million households were affected - or between 17-25% of all households in #PRS 4/..
What was the impact? In the paper we carefully trace out the impact of this cut. We find: the cut increased forced evictions in private rented sector by 21%; individual bankruptcies by 3%; theft from persons and burglaries by 25%... 5/..
We see a dramatic increase (17.8 %) in households living in temp accommodation; statutory homelessness goes up by 13.2% & rough sleeping by 36.7%. There are 135k children spending Christmas in shelters & many go regularly hungry see @C4Dispatches: 6/..
This is hugely costly in the long term: housing insecurity has pervasive effects on the achievement of children (Chyn, 2018), it is a harbinger of poor health (Fowler et al., 2015); increases the chances of being laid off from work (Desmond and Gershenson, 2016). 7/..
We know this is a huge costly social policy choice. But even in the short, term it turned out to be very costly. Why? The increase in homelessness to whom councils owe a duty implied that councils had to dramatically increase spending on homelessness prevention measures. 8/..
The cost of temporary accommodation, such as bed and breakfasts, hostels has shot up by 94%. In many cases, local councils now have to lease or rent former council homes that were sold off from private landlords/investors -- guess what, at market rents! 9/...
And this is where fiscally things go full circle. We estimate that the savings to the @DWP for cutting housing benefit amounted to around GBP 500 million; we also estimate that council spending for homeless prevention measures has shot up by at least GBP 265 million. 10/...
As councils have limited means of raising revenues, let alone issue debt, they are left with cutting services elsewhere to pay for these extra costs. Fiscally, this policy likely did not save a penny due to the costs associated with higher crime, evictions, bankruptcies,... 11/..
But it gets even worse: the cuts erode democratic participation. We document that electoral registration rates declined sharply, and, it very likely affected the 2016 #EURef vote by shifting the composition of those that turn out or engage with democratic processes. 12/..
After all, democratic participation likely is a normal good with a positive income elasticity; if you hardly can make ends meet and live in insecure accommodation, making sure your details on electoral roll are up to date are second order. 13/..
Turnout in #EURef in places more affected by the housing benefit cut was 2 percentage points lower; support for #Leave is up to 1-3 percentage points higher, likely due to the missing voters. Among those that did not turn out in 2016, support for #Remain to #Leave is 2:1. 14/..
On Thursday #GE2019, this country choses. The #ConservativeParty is fighting this election with deception & contempt. Only #TacticalVoting can prevent a continuation of the status quo & bring about a resolution. One thing is guaranteed #Brexit will bring more #austerity not less.
Read the whole paper with the title "Housing insecurity, homelessness and populism: Evidence from the UK" here: bit.ly/2sX0FdQ @warwickecon @warwicknewsroom
@warwickecon @warwicknewsroom I should add, the paper is joint work with my fantastic coauthor, colleague and fellow @LSEEcon graduate @pedroclsouza and @warwickecon PhD student Srinjoy Sen.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Thiemo Fetzer

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!