Their withdrawal from Tory held seats increased the national Con vote share from an average of 39% to 42%.
But this increase, in terms of gaining Lab seats, is worth nothing. And is likely to benefit Lab.
Why? Let's find out...
1/8
1) It made retaining existing seats a bit easier
2) It increased their vote share in those seats, and thus increased their national vote share
It did not increase their vote in Lab seats.
2/8
1) Brex are attracting Lab Leavers who voted UKIP in 2015 and Con in 2017
2) They are attracting more Con voters than Lab voters, due to there being far more Con leavers
Let's look at the impact of this.
3/8
A typical 65% Leave voting Lab marginal. 40% Lab voters and 40% Con.
Lab voters = 60/40 remain
Con voters = 20/80 leave
Brex come along. They take 25% of leavers from both parties.
That hurts Con more:
Lab: 36% (-4%)
Con: 32% (-8%)
4/8
1) The same percentage of leave voters are switching from Lab to Brex and Con to Brex
2) This hurts Con more because they have a much higher base of Leavers
Even if Brex took more Leavers from Lab, say 60/40, it would still hurt Con more.
5/8
Then there is the national vote share
Con national % in polls is inflated by around 3% due to the Brexit party not standing in Con seats.
This 3% increase in VI won't win seats
6/8
But 3% of that Con lead, in terms of the marginal battlegrounds, is an illusion. It counts for nothing.
Yes, it helps them defend seats. But it won't take a single marginal for them.
7/8
1) An illusionary 3% boost to Con vote share that achieves no gains
2) It is now harder for Con to win Lab Leave seats
It's surprising how few political commentators have understood these simple facts.
END