BREAKING NEWS: NBC Poll Shows Same Top 3 in New Hampshire As Iowa: Sanders, Buttigieg, Warren
2⃣5⃣ Sanders
2⃣1⃣ Buttigieg
1⃣4⃣ Warren
1⃣3⃣ Biden
8⃣ Klobuchar
4⃣ Yang
4⃣ Steyer
3⃣ Gabbard
1⃣ Patrick
1⃣ Bennet
It's time for media to STOP ERASING WARREN. She remains in the Top 3.
2⃣5⃣ Sanders
2⃣1⃣ Buttigieg
1⃣4⃣ Warren
1⃣3⃣ Biden
8⃣ Klobuchar
4⃣ Yang
4⃣ Steyer
3⃣ Gabbard
1⃣ Patrick
1⃣ Bennet
It's time for media to STOP ERASING WARREN. She remains in the Top 3.
PS/ Another reason Sanders, Buttigieg, and Warren should be seen as a "Top 3"—besides the fact that you have the same Top 3 in New Hampshire now as you had in Iowa—is because *all three* have *gained* since the January NBC poll, whereas Biden (4) and Klobuchar (5) have *dropped*.
PS2/ @chucktodd says a third-place NH finish for Warren would be very hard to explain because...{*checks notes*} Granite Staters are particularly solicitous of people from Massachusetts, so a Massachusetts senator "should" do well. That's a terrible misreading of Granite Staters.
@chucktodd PS3/ Put it this way: I expect most of those bored by the Sanders-Buttigieg tiff, which is a lot of people, will be looking at the two women in the Top 5, Warren and Klobuchar, and because Warren (14%) is clearly ahead of Klobuchar (8%), she stands to benefit the most on Tuesday.
@chucktodd PS4/ I was at the NH Democratic Convention. To my knowledge, most of those MSNBC/CNN are talking to about the primary are neither from New Hampshire nor were at the convention.
At the convention, *objectively* speaking there was only one candidate treated as a rock star: Warren.
At the convention, *objectively* speaking there was only one candidate treated as a rock star: Warren.
@chucktodd PS5/ Sanders will do well in NH, aided in part by him running here in 2016 *and* that Granite Staters are more aware of upper-New England pols. Warren and Buttigieg both lack either of those advantages and should be talked about a *ton* by the media for their current positioning.
