ORDER OF EVENTS
Is this right?
1⃣ WARREN and KLOBUCHAR share NYT endorsement.
2⃣ WARREN finishes 3rd in a state (IA) bordering the home state of KLOBUCHAR, KLOBUCHAR places 5th.
3⃣ WARREN is 3rd nationally (14%), KLOBUCHAR 6th (4.8%).
4⃣ Pre-NH, all media focus is on KLOBUCHAR.
Is this right?
1⃣ WARREN and KLOBUCHAR share NYT endorsement.
2⃣ WARREN finishes 3rd in a state (IA) bordering the home state of KLOBUCHAR, KLOBUCHAR places 5th.
3⃣ WARREN is 3rd nationally (14%), KLOBUCHAR 6th (4.8%).
4⃣ Pre-NH, all media focus is on KLOBUCHAR.
PS/ Media: *stop trying to make Klobuchar happen*. The data doesn't support the idea she has grassroots energy—in fact, the data suggest she would've dropped out by now—and we all *know* that if she does well tonight, you'll act *surprised*. But *you're* trying to make it happen!
PS2/ Granite Staters: Vote your conscience, always; vote for anyone you like. But do realize that media is pushing on America *two* candidates without clear grassroots support: KLOBUCHAR and BLOOMBERG. I don't like the idea of my state being led by the nose by D.C. media pundits.
PS3/ KLOBUCHAR is a good person and good senator. I don't intend any disrespect to her or her voters. But her coverage does not match facts on the ground. As for BLOOMBERG, I don't know if he's a good person or not—but I know he's winning with money, not by meeting actual humans.
