, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
Good news & kudos to Times journalists.

But why had Ministers approved blanket charges, regardless of individual humanitarian cases?
Ministers can’t claim didn’t know about forced marriage when they made the policy.

10 years ago Ministers used forced marriage as excuse to ban people under 21 from living together in UK, where one partner wasn’t British. supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uks…
Supreme Court didn’t accept that & quashed the Immigration Rule on 2011.

For UK Gov though, opposing forced marriage justified breaking up genuine marriages of British citizens and didn’t justify paying for British citizens who are actual victims to come home. 🤔
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Simon Cox
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!