This weapon is too dangerous to be regulated piecemeal, city by city. It's unlike any other form of government surveillance.
We must stop it. Join us: banfacialrecognition.com
They're trying to avoid the real debate: whether this tech should even exist.
It's misdirection. Companies like Microsoft & Amazon will benefit tremendously from the expansion of total surveillance
But the tech is fundamentally flawed. It cannot be made safe.
washingtonpost.com/technology/201…
When the ACLU used Amazon's Rekognition on members of Congress, it falsely matched 28 of them with people arrested for crimes.
cnet.com/news/facial-re…
theverge.com/2019/6/27/1876…
They have access to millions of people's data at their fingertips, but do not need to get a warrant to use it.
perpetuallineup.org
nytimes.com/2019/01/24/tec…
One activist said if it was allowed to roll out in Detroit, “there really isn’t any hope for black residents anywhere else in the United States.”
nytimes.com/2019/07/08/us/…
Hackers & foreign govs will want your data, & it's only a matter of time before they get it.
digitalguardian.com/blog/top-10-bi…
A database of all our faces would be no different.
apnews.com/699236946e3140…
There is no good reason for our gov. to track, control, & oppress all of its citizens. Facial recognition would allow such control, at a level never before seen.
theatlantic.com/international/…
Facial recognition technology by any gov. agency, in any gov. contract, & in all public places must be banned.
This weapon, like nukes, is too dangerous. Help us stop it: banfacialrecognition.com