,
14 tweets,
6 min read
Read on Twitter
Come on @SkyNews, the story is not that Trump attacks Khan - it's that he quote-tweets the vile Katie Hopkins & her virulent Islamophobia.
This should not be difficult.
news.sky.com/story/hes-a-di…
This should not be difficult.
news.sky.com/story/hes-a-di…
In case it changes, the headline looks like this 
Wouldn't expect anything different from The Sun & Mail Online - but still...
Slightly better in Independent in that reference to Hopkins was made in the sub-headline - still awful.
For the record - the full Mail Online headline and sub-headlines - not ONE mention of Katie Hopkins. I know it's the Mail Online but this is truly outrageous.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7…
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7…
As of now, I cannot see a BBC, Guardian, Times or Telegraph piece on this topic - hence their exclusion from the above thread.
Awful from the @guardian. Really expected better. Maybe it was the framing of the agencies but still...truly disappointing.
theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/j…
theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/j…
This is how it looks on the Guardian's front page. Seriously - what's going on?
And LBC
Telegraph piece doesn't mention Hopkins at all!
The Guardian's piece (not from agencies) was eventually well framed and the best
"Donald Trump criticised for quoting Katie Hopkins in attack on Sadiq Khan" theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/j…
"Donald Trump criticised for quoting Katie Hopkins in attack on Sadiq Khan" theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/j…
