,
5 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
NEW: Mueller is done, but Trump’s ability to obstruct congressional / legal investigations isn’t. His post-Mueller actions — including attacks on witnesses like Don McGahn — are adding to the already devastating pile of evidence for Dems and prosecutors. go.politicoemail.com/?qs=b1c6add7f5…
Trump has tweeted more than 50 times about the Russia probe since Thursday, even though his tweets are fodder for prosecutors, and that they believe his conduct is indictable post-presidency. There are still ongoing prosecutions connected to Mueller. go.politicoemail.com/?qs=b1c6add7f5…
We already know one person has been indicted for witness tampering in a congressional probe: Roger Stone. And Mueller laid out evidence to suggest Trump acted similarly toward Michael Cohen before his hill testimony. Can he resist going after McGahn? go.politicoemail.com/?qs=b1c6add7f5…
"The president ought to be accountable for any additional conduct that may constitute an attempt to impede or interfere," said Rep. @DavidCicilline, a member of the Judiciary Committee.
@davidcicilline Here's Mueller's legal analysis of why Trump's tweets and public comments are evidence of obstruction >>
politico.com/story/2019/04/…
politico.com/story/2019/04/…
