New material.
"Feeding the beast" is an imperative.
So why supply extremist rhetoric in soundbites crafted for your ostensible adversaries?
They had 14+ years of The Apprentice and assorted birtherism to work with regarding Trump, & 25+ years of attacks on Clinton.
What did they keep using?
New clips, images, accusations, even for attacks hailing back.
I'm not talking about foreign assets, bad actors and the woefully manipulated.
But for sane people opposed to all this, why work to support a mortal threat you supposedly disdain?
They were too obvious, & documented themselves in the public domain, through, say, Twitter, especially all the tweets archived by the Library of Congress until the end of 2017, & cryptocurrency logs.
Yes, eventually. I don't think those hostile nations counted on Epstein and the other monsters being taken down publicly.
They've likely planned to muddy the waters, decry investigations as political, & pretend the espionage is.
"All. Too. Unbelievable."
If you had no endgame, just an urgent desire to triage and save what you could, what would you do?
You're expendable also, of course, but presumably you know that.
For everyone else?
Be advised.
Doing anything and everything to prevent a viable candidate from emerging is critical.
This puts them in a vise, which is steadily tightening.
As their assets are increasingly outed, hostile foreign intelligence needs America to distract itself, where their resources are no longer adequate to do so.
They can't play that game with large numbers of elites on video raping children.
Game Over.