ponokanews.com/opinion/mla-ro…
WHY WOULD YOU NOT CONSULT THE OWNERS OF THE FUNDS IF YOU MOVED THEM TO A NEW INVESTMENT MANAGER? #wrongthingtodo
This confuses (intentionally in my view) ATRF with LAPP. SFPP, and PSPP.
The ATRF plan (unlike the other plans) is jointly sponsored. It has been for 80 years.
Both teachers and GOA would be on the hook for future liabilities.
Which means you should have consulted with teachers.
False.
The ATRF said they had higher returns than AIMCO. The ATRF is not a union. And, when you apply an accepted methodology in comparing returns they are higher. #really
Do you really think you should get ATRF return data from AIMCO? #really
AIMCo prepared the business case that went to GOA Cabinet. That is poor governance all day long.
#bullshit
ATRF only spends $28 million on investment admin; HOW CAN THEY SAVE $41 MILLION?
True
I am cheap. Just ask my kids. I love saving money.
But the risk that the OAG needs to address is that if the plan under-performs by 0.1% then all savings are lost and it costs you more.
Ron, you can't trust these people. You have employees who are CFA charter holders that should be doing this work for you. #whynot
They make no quantifiable argument as to where the savings comes from.
Teachers should be singled out because they are the only jointly sponsored plan. Lumping them in with plans that are not is wrong.
Doing so at the behest of AIMCo is poor public policy.
#handsoffmypension
#bullshit
GOA removed the guarantee in 1992.
Remind me again, whose money is this?
My calculation shows that this move will cost GOA $80-100 million each and every year going forward.
#handsoffmypension #aimcoisconflicted #conflictofinterest