When you consider what Trump—as president—does all day as his “work” it makes sense that the way Pelosi and Schiff are conducting this impeachment is throwing off his game.
@TimothyDSnyder
explains Trump's "task" is to create crisis & spectacle.
He can’t do that with the impeachment probe. He has lost control of the media narrative.
People make fun of how much cable TV Trump watches. Of course he watches TV. How else can he plan his game?
Snyder explains that governing by [invented] crisis and [controlled] spectacle is a fascist means of gaining and maintaining power.⤵️
The technique comes from Putin. . .
(Yes, Trump is smart enough to use this technique. He’s a natural, and the technique isn’t hard.)
Ilyin was a Russian nobleman who went into exile after the communist revolution.
Ilyin believed fascism would eventually replace both communism and democracy.
Ilyin admired totalitarianism and order.
Each must remain in its place.
Fascism = order.
Democracy & communism = disorder & chaos.
Ilyin disliked the middle class, which was always striving for social advancement. . .
He thought the rulers at the top should rule, everyone else must remain in their place.
He thus advocated oligarchy (a few people hold all the power).
The task of government, for Ilyin, is to create stability.
Thus the task of the oligarchs is to preserve the status quo, which means preserving their own wealth and power.
But you can’t tell the people THAT.
So you tell them a good story. . .
The Leader-Redeemer creates a “mystical connection” with the nation and the people.
He earns loyalty by protecting the people from "enemies."
The fascist way to power is to promise to restore the nation to its mythic greatness.
An oligarch or would-be oligarch can’t do that!
If he does, others can rise up and challenge his place at the top.
There will be no "stability."
They manufacture crises.
See:
They identify “enemies” (brown people, immigrants, Democrats, liberals, migrants, etc.)
They select enemies that can’t actually hurt them (like homeless poverty-stricken migrant families.)
This way they don't have to worry about actual bombs falling on their own heads.
It's much safer.
He does this partly by creating outrage. See:
He didn’t mind that the Mueller probe was hidden from the public because he and his lawyers knew what was happening behind those closed doors. . .
He misdirected everyone by shouting “NO COLLUSION" for 2 years ⤵️
People said “yes collusion!”
When there wasn't evidence beyond a reasonable for conspiracy, he shouted “COMPLETE EXONERATION.”
But it isn’t working!
When he obstructs, Schiff announces that they’ll simply fold the obstruction into the Articles of Impeachment.
Schiff calmly explains that obstruction shows guilt.
Last spring, the House started subpoenaing the key documents (taxes, bank records). They'll soon have what they need.
They already have enough.
nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/…
Of course Trump is frustrated!
The House Democrats are in control of the narrative.
💠controlling & spinning the media narrative,
💠inventing the kind of crises he likes, and
💠sending his critics spinning with outrage.
So he attacks the probe as "totally unfair" and Tweets nonsense like this⤵️
Trump is losing.
People are always amazed that Trump supporters vote against their own economic self-interest.
But Trump gives them what they want more than economic advancement: A fight against their "enemies."
They love the fight and the show.
A fascist technique is to create "us v. them" (see @jasonintrator's book)
Goes like this:
"He's a corrupt liar, but he's OUR corrupt liar. [Biden / fill in the blank] is the enemy corrupt liar. So let's stick with our corrupt liar."
Also, the wrongdoing occurred within the Trump campaign, so the only witnesses were Trump world insiders.
This wrongdoing occurred in the White House, so we have witnesses in the State Department and other agencies.
Back when Trump appeared to be trying to goad the House into impeachment, it was when impeachment would have been basically about the Mueller findings.
The Ukraine scandal entirely changed everything.
With the Mueller stuff. . .
Answering this question overlaps with the mistake that the "impeach right now" people were making last spring.
Legally, the House can keep impeaching. Politically, it would be insane.
Imagine this. . .
See how that looks?
If Trump had been impeached last spring. . .
The House would have looked silly impeaching again. . .
Pelosi has decades of Intel experience. A lot of the Ukraine stuff happened in the open.
What's happening now is much more serious and compelling.
Pelosi waited for this to come out.
Check mate.
Given that she's the most experienced and savvy person in politics, I'll take Door #2.
Being a woman complicates this. People are less likely to assume she knows what she's doing.
See:
Giuliani's financials led to a counter-intelligence investigation, which no doubt is linked to both Trump's finances and the Ukraine scandal.
Trump's financials could have brought us to almost the same spot.
foreignpolicy.com/2019/05/07/us-…
I am becoming more persuaded that Speaker Pelosi knew something was up in Ukraine, and that it would come out.
BTW. . .
People are amazed that Trump posted this image that makes Pelosi look so in command.
It seems to me that in Trump's misogynistic mind, a woman not looking like . . .
Think of those blonde Barbies on Fox, how Trump wants Ivanka to look, his comment about Fiorina's face.
For most of us, she's taking him down.
I'll just add this here, even though the thread is already too long.
Today, @JRubinBlogger
wrote this: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
She had the same idea I had yesterday: Trump is frustrated because he's unable to control the spectacle.