Environmentalism, and now it seems, human rights NGOs are degenerate.
standaard.be/cnt/dmf2019102…
No, using fossil fuels is not destructive. It's not destructive of persons, of peoples, of the environment, in fact.
It has allowed peoples to thrive and for people to prosper. It has allowed for steady development of all kinds, including the social and political development of billions.
It is exactly the opposite of what it claims to be. It is *deeply* anti-human. I do not think it is dramatic to say that it resonates with the logic of the Soviet Union in the 20s-50s.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0XRhXX4AYU278.png)
"A death penalty for the entire world population" -- such bullshit is a moral blank cheque, isn't it, which can be used to demand anything and everything.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0YGpzXYAAZgp8.png)
He would lived through many typhoons afflicting the region. His ignorance is no defence of his ridiculous claims.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0aeTOX0AApYrX.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0bOw2X4AAZP9f.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0bOw1XUAYDSG6.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0bOwzWwAE5iia.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0bOw1X0AAb62Y.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0b_cqWkAIFWla.png)
Yet then, look what he says about "affluenza".
"You don't need money", he says.
He is unaware of the contradiction. No, worse, he is aware, but is indifferent to it.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EH0dta0W4AAISXL.png)
He doesn't say, "people in Mozambique should aspire to have what people in the west have", and that this wealth would ensure that typhoons do not take such a heavy toll.
It is a total inversion of morality. It is ideology, pure and simple. And total indifferent to reality.